Proposal: Buffalo-Minnesota
- Thread starter dkollidas
- Start date
pigpen65
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2011
- 3,966
- 955
=0 value. Would have to be more like Kane + Buffalo's first round pick for future considerations.
Twoods1623
Registered User
No way buddy ol pal. Hard hard pass. Trading a potential stud of a defenseman and at the worst a 3rd line winger for a troublemaker. I'm good. I'd take reinhart though for that package.
I don't know what team would touch Kane with all his off ice issues. Really need to give a team some incentive to take the idiot.
Buffalo doesn't need a RHD that requires expansion draft protection without upgrading the position, and Minny doesn't need the extra cap or to give up an extra asset for Kane in the process.
This trade is just unnecessary for both teams.
This trade is just unnecessary for both teams.
Dr Quincy
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2005
- 29,392
- 11,752
forthewild
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2009
- 4,115
- 0
Stuzchuk
Registered User
I wouldnt deal either one for KAne...
He has to prove that he can actually play hockey first and quiet the **** up when he's off the ice
He has to prove that he can actually play hockey first and quiet the **** up when he's off the ice
nickschultzfan
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2009
- 11,558
- 909
This doesn't help the Wild at all. Parise, Granlund, and Nino are much better LW options to have than Kane, who has zero hockey sense, a huge contract, and is a off-ice problem to boot.
Engebretson
Thank you, sweet rabbit
Putting the trade value aside, the Wild are in need of young centers. We have enough young wingers on the roster and trading from our blueline to add more wingers would be very suspect, IMO.
As far as the trade value, I'm not sure if Kane is being overrated or Dumba is being underrated, but it's nowhere close. Throwing in Zucker makes it even worse.
As far as the trade value, I'm not sure if Kane is being overrated or Dumba is being underrated, but it's nowhere close. Throwing in Zucker makes it even worse.
So why would MN be interested in that? Not to mention it's 2 years of Kane and then he's a UFA whereas both Dumba and Zucker are still RFA's likely cheaper combined than Kane is individually for the next 2 years.
Dampland
Registered User
Minnesota counters with
TO WILD:
Eichel
Reinhart
Fasching
TO SABRES:
Jason Pomenville
Jordan Schroeder
Nate Prosser
seems about as fair as the OP proposal!
Kane is toxic right now. Why borrow trouble? Unlike Nino, who has turned out fine both on and off the ice, Kane has legitimate character concerns.
Don't see the Wild being interested at any price, let alone the two players mentioned.
Don't see the Wild being interested at any price, let alone the two players mentioned.
Bruce Granville
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2014
- 5,917
- 4,627
Terrible proposal. No more to say.
Why would Minnesota consider this ?
It doesn't even fill the Sabres needs despite clearly 'winning' the trade either.
Why would Minnesota consider this ?
It doesn't even fill the Sabres needs despite clearly 'winning' the trade either.
Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
The Wild could get way more for Dba alone. They'd also have no motivation to move him for a winner.
Kane is still a decent player but his off ice activities have killed his trade value.
Kane is still a decent player but his off ice activities have killed his trade value.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
GDT: Game 19: New York Rangers @ Edmonton Oilers, 10pm ET, MSG- Latest: Captain Lindy
-
-
-
