Buffalo Bills: Offseason - 2019 Schedule Released with NFL Draft Upcoming

Status
Not open for further replies.

26CornerBlitz

1970
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2012
29,723
3,455
South Jersey
Trapasso: "Best-case scenario would be Ed Oliver falling to pick No. 9"

The 2019 NFL Draft is just over three weeks away, as the festivities are ready to begin on Thursday, April 25th from Nashville, Tennessee. Much speculation is still being made about what the Buffalo Bills should do with their ninth-overall pick in the first round. For some insight, CBS Sports NFL Draft Writer Chris Trapasso joined the Bulldog and Sal Capaccio on Wednesday about the latest ideas and possibilities for Buffalo.
 

La Cosa Nostra

Caporegime
Jun 25, 2009
14,110
2,379
Bills add Spain...48 starts in 4 years. I do not see how they take OL in the first. I like the idea of bringing in a bunch of OL in free agency. Use the 9th pick on players who make actual game changing impact plays. A playmaker who can score TDs. A DT who can disrupt the backfield and wreck havoc. A linebacker who can cover the entire field.A corner who can shut down any WR.Using #9 on a OL is just disappointing.I know OL is valuable and the best of them spring nice blocks and protect their QB but this team needs star talent. They need players who can change the game with one play.OL doesn't do that.Not to mention the ghost of Mike Williams will always scare me off OL in the top 10. I do not trust tackles in the top 10.

Ronnie Stanley, Luke Joeckel, Greg Robinson, Eric Fisher, DJ Fluker,Ereck Flowers etc for every Joe Thomas there are 2 or 3 of these guys.Oliver would be ideal.
 

Husko

Registered User
Jun 30, 2006
15,516
7,894
Greenwich, CT
Bills add Spain...48 starts in 4 years. I do not see how they take OL in the first. I like the idea of bringing in a bunch of OL in free agency. Use the 9th pick on players who make actual game changing impact plays. A playmaker who can score TDs. A DT who can disrupt the backfield and wreck havoc. A linebacker who can cover the entire field.A corner who can shut down any WR.Using #9 on a OL is just disappointing.I know OL is valuable and the best of them spring nice blocks and protect their QB but this team needs star talent. They need players who can change the game with one play.OL doesn't do that.Not to mention the ghost of Mike Williams will always scare me off OL in the top 10. I do not trust tackles in the top 10.

Ronnie Stanley, Luke Joeckel, Greg Robinson, Eric Fisher, DJ Fluker,Ereck Flowers etc for every Joe Thomas there are 2 or 3 of these guys.Oliver would be ideal.
I don't see how signing a guard has any affect on whether they would take a OT at 9. They were never going to take a guard at 9 anyway.

As for a LB... that would seem like the biggest wasted pick of all. Give we already have 2 high quality starting LBs, and our base defense is nickel, you would essentially be using he #9OA pick on a subpackage player to only come in for obvious running downs. I think that would be my #1 most hated pick.

Adding offense anyway, shape, or form is still my #1 preference.
 

DJB

Registered User
Jan 6, 2009
16,540
11,394
twitter.com
Uhh yeah I know, that's why I said he's a better prospect. If I were basing it purely on "fantasy football scoring" aka actual yards and TDs, Smith and Fant would have the higher ceilings. Hock is not as dynamic.

Maybe its me but in that post i dont see you saying hes a better prospect.
 

missingmika

Registered User
Dec 9, 2006
4,554
1,871
Bills add Spain...48 starts in 4 years. I do not see how they take OL in the first. I like the idea of bringing in a bunch of OL in free agency. Use the 9th pick on players who make actual game changing impact plays. A playmaker who can score TDs. A DT who can disrupt the backfield and wreck havoc. A linebacker who can cover the entire field.A corner who can shut down any WR.Using #9 on a OL is just disappointing.I know OL is valuable and the best of them spring nice blocks and protect their QB but this team needs star talent. They need players who can change the game with one play.OL doesn't do that.Not to mention the ghost of Mike Williams will always scare me off OL in the top 10. I do not trust tackles in the top 10.

Ronnie Stanley, Luke Joeckel, Greg Robinson, Eric Fisher, DJ Fluker,Ereck Flowers etc for every Joe Thomas there are 2 or 3 of these guys.Oliver would be ideal.

There's 2 or 3 of those guys for every position in the top 10.

For every Barry Sanders there are Curtis Enis, Rasshad Salaam.

For every Payton Manning there's RG3, Jake Locker, Ryan Leaf.

For every Dieon Sanders there's Dee Milner, and Justin Gilbert.
 

La Cosa Nostra

Caporegime
Jun 25, 2009
14,110
2,379
I don't see how signing a guard has any affect on whether they would take a OT at 9. They were never going to take a guard at 9 anyway.

As for a LB... that would seem like the biggest wasted pick of all. Give we already have 2 high quality starting LBs, and our base defense is nickel, you would essentially be using he #9OA pick on a subpackage player to only come in for obvious running downs. I think that would be my #1 most hated pick.

Adding offense anyway, shape, or form is still my #1 preference.

Williams is no guarantee to be a tackle.Many in the NFL see him as a guard.

Edmunds and Milano are good not great right now. Lorax is done soon. There are no non QB offensive skill players worth the #9 pick that's the point. Trade downs are no guarantee and I'd take Oliver,Quennen, Devin White or Greedy Williams at 9 over reaching for a non worthy wide out or a TE.l All the best tight ends are almost exclusively non 1st round picks.
 

Husko

Registered User
Jun 30, 2006
15,516
7,894
Greenwich, CT
Since most seem to agree that we need to add a RB at some point (day 2 or more likely 3), I'm wondering if anyone has any favorite RB options in the draft.

I've made my love for Love well known. I think he's the perfect addition to our backfield. Quick, speedy, and a high end pass catcher out of the backfield. I think he would be Kamara/McCaffrey-lite with a high ceiling. Only reason he will be drafted as low as he will be is because he's coming off an injury.

Who else do you guys like? Anyone else in the quick/speedy/pass catcher variety I should be aware of. The draft notwithstanding, I think that remains one of the biggest holes on the roster (speedy pass catching back), which we didn't address at all in FA.
 

Husko

Registered User
Jun 30, 2006
15,516
7,894
Greenwich, CT
Since most seem to agree that we need to add a RB at some point (day 2 or more likely 3), I'm wondering if anyone has any favorite RB options in the draft.

I've made my love for Love well known. I think he's the perfect addition to our backfield. Quick, speedy, and a high end pass catcher out of the backfield. I think he would be Kamara/McCaffrey-lite with a high ceiling. Only reason he will be drafted as low as he will be is because he's coming off an injury.

Who else do you guys like? Anyone else in the quick/speedy/pass catcher variety I should be aware of. The draft notwithstanding, I think that remains one of the biggest holes on the roster (speedy pass catching back), which we didn't address at all in FA.
James Williams is someone I'm enjoying reading about right now. Comped to Cohen/White. A pass catching specialist with almost as many career catches as carries.
 

cramdizzl

cram it
Jan 5, 2012
2,462
266
Western NY
Maybe its me but in that post i dont see you saying hes a better prospect.

Maybe it was worded poorly, but "I don't see Hockensen being that much better than Smith or Fant" means I think he is a slightly better prospect than the other two. I'd be fine with him in a trade down scenario but at 9 I think there will be more impactful options available. If an elite DL prospect isn't available at 9 then McDermott may be salivating at the idea of drafting the best corner available. And then in the 2nd they can probably still get a very good TE.
 

Zman5778

Moderator
Oct 4, 2005
26,823
25,611
Cressona/Reading, PA
Maybe it was worded poorly, but "I don't see Hockensen being that much better than Smith or Fant" means I think he is a slightly better prospect than the other two. I'd be fine with him in a trade down scenario but at 9 I think there will be more impactful options available. If an elite DL prospect isn't available at 9 then McDermott may be salivating at the idea of drafting the best corner available. And then in the 2nd they can probably still get a very good TE.

At the TE position, I personally only see Hockenson, Fant and Smith as being sure-thing NFL starters. And I think they all go in the first round. Wilson could develop into something, possibly. Everyone else is a project IMO.

TE is very shallow this year talent-wise. If the Bills are bent on getting a TE in this draft, it's either at 9 or after a trade-down. I don't think one worthy of a 2nd round pick will be there in round 2.
 

26CornerBlitz

1970
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2012
29,723
3,455
South Jersey
Joe B: 2019 NFL Mock Draft No. 3

(WKBW) — Only three weeks to go before NFL teams can add substantial, or so they hope, players that will play a big role in the future of their organizations. And the angling for the first round of the 2019 version has only just begun.

Last time, in my second iteration of mock, the Buffalo Bills made a move down the board to capitalize on value. And this time around, I have them capitalizing on value in a different way.

Without further ado, mock draft number three:


6) **TRADE
bil-mark-1-rgb_1488858415418_56401400_ver1.0_60_45.jpg
(from NYG) - DT Quinnen Williams, Alabama
- Sitting at ninth overall, the Bills have a desperate need to add a three-technique defensive tackle that can generate pressure from the interior. The Bills do have the option of staying at ninth overall, but should Quinnen Williams -- the prototypical player the Bills covet at the glaring need and at such an important position to Sean McDermott's defense -- fall outside of the top four, I would not be surprised if GM Brandon Beane got on the phone to make a move up the board. After all, we've seen plenty of proof that Beane is willing to move up the board in the draft. To the Bills, I believe the hierarchy of positions, in terms of importance to having a core player in roster building, goes something like this: quarterback, middle linebacker, three-technique defensive tackle, defensive end, center. I believe offensive tackle is important to the Bills as well, but not quite like the five core spots I listed. The Bills have addressed quarterback, middle linebacker, and center. They have three starting caliber defensive ends on their roster for the 2019 season. And at three-technique defensive tackle, all they have left is Jordan Phillips and Robert Thomas -- a spot crying out for a starter. Head coach Sean McDermott agreed with the notion that stopping interior pressure is more difficult than stopping an edge rusher, and called getting heat on the quarterback from the interior "critical." So, if the cost for adding a player that can be an impact starter at a core position to their philosophy is a third and fifth-round pick, so be it. Talent, and the potential for dominance in one player trumps spending a third-round pick on a role player and a fifth-round selection on a lottery ticket. In Williams, the Bills would add a nuisance along the interior who has the size, explosiveness, length, pass rushing moves, and run-stuffing ability that could turn him into a home run of a selection. He is a Day One starter, and could become the best player on the defensive line by the end of the season -- and a core building block for the Bills moving forward, no less. I think a third and fifth-round pick is worth the potential of all that.

Trade Details: New York Giants receive 9th overall, 74th overall, 147th overall. Buffalo receives 6th overall, 232nd overall.

40)
bil-mark-1-rgb_1488858415418_56401400_ver1.0_60_45.jpg
- EDGE Jaylon Ferguson, Louisiana Tech
- Over the last two drafts, the Bills haven't invested a single selection into players that rush the passer. With the first-round pick of Quinnen Williams, and now the second-round selection of Jaylon Ferguson, the Bills have now invested heavily in a vital component to their attack past just the 2019 season. While tight end and wide receiver were both considered with this selection, there were significant factors as to why Ferguson was the pick over them. With wide receiver, the Bills have four players on the roster already that need playing time. At tight end, the value of the pick didn't line up with the players available at the position with TJ Hockenson, Noah Fant, and Irv Smith already off the board. The value, at least with how this board shakes out, is with Ferguson even if finding a defensive end isn't a need for the upcoming season. Jerry Hughes and Shaq Lawson are both due to become unrestricted free agents, which means the Bills have nothing substantial besides Trent murphy on the books for the 2020 season. Ferguson has the desired build that the Bills look for in a defensive end at 6-foot-5, 271-pounds, and with a 34 and 1/2-inch arm length. He is a highly productive player, and while he doesn't get you the bend around the edge that some of the other available edge defenders does, he does provide enough technical ability to get to the quarterback and to also work in unison with the rest of the defensive line to bring down the quarterback. He's dependable as a run defender, and at worst, should be a core rotational player for years to come. He also has the potential to be a starting player in this defense for 2020 and beyond, depending on how he adapts against better competition. It's not the flashiest of selections, but the Bills know exactly what they'd be getting in Ferguson, and that's a contributor right out of the gate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJB

cramdizzl

cram it
Jan 5, 2012
2,462
266
Western NY
At the TE position, I personally only see Hockenson, Fant and Smith as being sure-thing NFL starters. And I think they all go in the first round. Wilson could develop into something, possibly. Everyone else is a project IMO.

TE is very shallow this year talent-wise. If the Bills are bent on getting a TE in this draft, it's either at 9 or after a trade-down. I don't think one worthy of a 2nd round pick will be there in round 2.

I'd say its a coin flip. I could definitely see it playing out like in Joe B's mock right there where two go in the 1st and one early in the 2nd, but three TEs in the 1st is pretty rare and with this defensive class I'd be pretty surprised. Not shocked but surprised.
 

26CornerBlitz

1970
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2012
29,723
3,455
South Jersey
Buffalo Bills, Cinderella team? Don't sleep on Josh Allen and Co.

D3U-NXrUwAADx6c.jpg


By Adam Schein - NFL.com Columnist

It's a springtime tradition unlike any other. Well, besides that one.

Two years ago, in the spirit of the NCAA tournament, my editors at NFL.com asked me to name an NFL Cinderella for the upcoming season.

The initial concept -- and something that I continue to stress -- is that my selection isn't necessarily a playoff pick. What I'm looking to do here, in simple terms, is spotlight an overlooked team that could turn some heads in the coming season. You know, like when a double-digit seed makes a tourney run. Here's the problem, though: My first two picks in this annual exercise have set the bar quite high.

In 2017, I chose Jacksonville as my Cinderella team. Those Jaguars won a division title for the first time this millennium and made it all the way to the AFC
Championship Game. Last year, I picked the Chicago Bears, who went from 5-11 cellar-dwellers to 12-4 NFC North champs.

So there's pressure on this pick. And this league's defining trait -- parity -- only increases the difficulty of this exercise.

I mean, what's a sleeper team in today's NFL anyways? The league is brilliantly set up for franchises to go from worst to first, rags to riches. You expect the Falcons to bounce back after a season leveled by injuries. The Browns are a legit threat to win in the playoffs. Those aren't sleeper teams. I thought about the Jets, a club I believe could be rather competitive -- and, dare I say, legit on offense? I considered the 49ers, who own the second overall pick in this month's draft, had a strong free agency period and are getting key players back from injury, starting at quarterback. But that's not Cinderella.

Enter the Buffalo Bills.

 
Last edited:

brian_griffin

"Eric Cartman?"
May 10, 2007
16,783
8,039
In the Panderverse
Joe B: 2019 NFL Mock Draft No. 3

(WKBW) — Only three weeks to go before NFL teams can add substantial, or so they hope, players that will play a big role in the future of their organizations. And the angling for the first round of the 2019 version has only just begun.

Last time, in my second iteration of mock, the Buffalo Bills made a move down the board to capitalize on value. And this time around, I have them capitalizing on value in a different way.

Without further ado, mock draft number three:


6) **TRADE
bil-mark-1-rgb_1488858415418_56401400_ver1.0_60_45.jpg
(from NYG) - DT Quinnen Williams, Alabama
- Sitting at ninth overall, the Bills have a desperate need to add a three-technique defensive tackle that can generate pressure from the interior. The Bills do have the option of staying at ninth overall, but should Quinnen Williams -- the prototypical player the Bills covet at the glaring need and at such an important position to Sean McDermott's defense -- fall outside of the top four, I would not be surprised if GM Brandon Beane got on the phone to make a move up the board. After all, we've seen plenty of proof that Beane is willing to move up the board in the draft. To the Bills, I believe the hierarchy of positions, in terms of importance to having a core player in roster building, goes something like this: quarterback, middle linebacker, three-technique defensive tackle, defensive end, center. I believe offensive tackle is important to the Bills as well, but not quite like the five core spots I listed. The Bills have addressed quarterback, middle linebacker, and center. They have three starting caliber defensive ends on their roster for the 2019 season. And at three-technique defensive tackle, all they have left is Jordan Phillips and Robert Thomas -- a spot crying out for a starter. Head coach Sean McDermott agreed with the notion that stopping interior pressure is more difficult than stopping an edge rusher, and called getting heat on the quarterback from the interior "critical." So, if the cost for adding a player that can be an impact starter at a core position to their philosophy is a third and fifth-round pick, so be it. Talent, and the potential for dominance in one player trumps spending a third-round pick on a role player and a fifth-round selection on a lottery ticket. In Williams, the Bills would add a nuisance along the interior who has the size, explosiveness, length, pass rushing moves, and run-stuffing ability that could turn him into a home run of a selection. He is a Day One starter, and could become the best player on the defensive line by the end of the season -- and a core building block for the Bills moving forward, no less. I think a third and fifth-round pick is worth the potential of all that.

Trade Details: New York Giants receive 9th overall, 74th overall, 147th overall. Buffalo receives 6th overall, 232nd overall.

40)
bil-mark-1-rgb_1488858415418_56401400_ver1.0_60_45.jpg
- EDGE Jaylon Ferguson, Louisiana Tech
- Over the last two drafts, the Bills haven't invested a single selection into players that rush the passer. With the first-round pick of Quinnen Williams, and now the second-round selection of Jaylon Ferguson, the Bills have now invested heavily in a vital component to their attack past just the 2019 season. While tight end and wide receiver were both considered with this selection, there were significant factors as to why Ferguson was the pick over them. With wide receiver, the Bills have four players on the roster already that need playing time. At tight end, the value of the pick didn't line up with the players available at the position with TJ Hockenson, Noah Fant, and Irv Smith already off the board. The value, at least with how this board shakes out, is with Ferguson even if finding a defensive end isn't a need for the upcoming season. Jerry Hughes and Shaq Lawson are both due to become unrestricted free agents, which means the Bills have nothing substantial besides Trent murphy on the books for the 2020 season. Ferguson has the desired build that the Bills look for in a defensive end at 6-foot-5, 271-pounds, and with a 34 and 1/2-inch arm length. He is a highly productive player, and while he doesn't get you the bend around the edge that some of the other available edge defenders does, he does provide enough technical ability to get to the quarterback and to also work in unison with the rest of the defensive line to bring down the quarterback. He's dependable as a run defender, and at worst, should be a core rotational player for years to come. He also has the potential to be a starting player in this defense for 2020 and beyond, depending on how he adapts against better competition. It's not the flashiest of selections, but the Bills know exactly what they'd be getting in Ferguson, and that's a contributor right out of the gate.
very dumb to trade up channel 7. If QW selected before Bills there will be starting caliber 3-Technique players still available. Or draft edge. Or take Tight end. And adding 47th and 74th picks to move up only 3 slots and just the 232nd in return is poor asset mgmt.
tweet not worthy of quoting IMO.
 

26CornerBlitz

1970
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2012
29,723
3,455
South Jersey
very dumb to trade up channel 7. If QW selected before Bills there will be starting caliber 3-Technique players still available. Or draft edge. Or take Tight end. And adding 47th and 74th picks to move up only 3 slots and just the 232nd in return is poor asset mgmt.
tweet not worthy of quoting IMO.

I think he'll go in the top 5.

 

Digable5

Buffalo Proton (Positively Charged)
Feb 23, 2004
5,169
1,097
West Seneca

If they AAF is going under, how do you explain the Jets new uniforms?

very dumb to trade up channel 7. If QW selected before Bills there will be starting caliber 3-Technique players still available. Or draft edge. Or take Tight end. And adding 47th and 74th picks to move up only 3 slots and just the 232nd in return is poor asset mgmt.
tweet not worthy of quoting IMO.
I like Joe B, but I'm in complete agreement with you. QW could be the next Marcell Dareus to be position specific or the next Sammy Watkins (trade up unnecessarily for player at a deep position in the draft) as a situational comparison. QW has more size than Oliver and better stats, but he also had a better team around him. In the NFL draft, you can find stars, starters, depth and complete busts all over the draft. To say a 3rd IS a depth guy and the 5th IS a Lottery pick makes him sound ignorant. We got two starters from UDFA last year.

As much as I like the trade back option, I'm fine with staying and taking the "best player" that falls to us if that is what they do. However, if you are trading up for QW when EO could fall to your spot, you had better be right. I like the additions Beane has made in the offseason, but we are still not a DT away from the Super Bowl. That would be the only reason to move up if its not for a QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brian_griffin
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad