LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2010
- 47,834
- 16,409
Why though? Malenstyn is a very useful NHL role guy. In a good draft sometimes you get to pick more or less safe prospects in the early parts of the 2nd round but looking at previous 43th overalls that's well inside the danger zone where you end up picking busts quite often...probably even more often than not. Historically, what are the odds of a 43th busting? I don't know but my guess would be north of 50%. So again. A 43th overall is just another lottery ticket, Beck Malenstyn is a player.
Why though? Malenstyn is a very useful NHL role guy. In a good draft sometimes you get to pick more or less safe prospects in the early parts of the 2nd round but looking at previous 43th overalls that's well inside the danger zone where you end up picking busts quite often...probably even more often than not. Historically, what are the odds of a 43th busting? I don't know but my guess would be north of 50%. So again. A 43th overall is just another lottery ticket, Beck Malenstyn is a player.
Sure he's an NHL player, that doesn't mean you should trade a 2nd round pick for him.
Andrew Mangipane went for a 2nd round pick,
Matthew Knies was a 2nd round pick 57th overall, baring injury that kid is going to score 20+ goals this year.
Fraser Minten was a 2nd round pick 38th overall he is 2 goals and 4 points behind Malenstyn and he's played 11 games..
PK Subban and Patrice Bergeron both 2nd round picks, one has a Norris, the other owned the Selke trophy.
And then you have Beck Malenstyn, a 4th liner that got a 2nd round pick.
You want to know why you don't trade a 2nd round pick for Beck Malenstyn?
The answer is above, every single player I mentioned is significantly better then Beck Malenstyn will EVER be.
2nd round picks are worth more because they get you more.
Beck Malenstyn is a worth a 4th, MAYBE a 3rd and Buffalo paid a 2nd because Buffalo has no clue what they are doing.