LongWayDown37
Registered User
- Mar 8, 2006
- 2,495
- 1,698
I don't see why the ranger trade Nash now that they aren't trying to sign big July 1 free agents or stamkos. Would love him on Bflo for 2 years, but can't see NYR doing it.
NO, b'cause:
We'd get more sending Nash to Bruins for Chara, J. Hayes, and McAvoy.
If this is to be kept simple, the EKane deal is for M. Staal; I would add Tambellini, a 3rd who looks like he'll make it, and boom bust 3rd Robin Kovacs who is good so far but very preliminary --- these I add only b'c of the dif in years on term of Kane and Staal contracts --- and that's it.
problem child for problem contract
[MOD]
And then Kane's contract is off the books next summer and the Rangers get the cap space.
If he behaves, then the Rangers can resign a talented player.
Why do the Rangers do this?
Rumor on the streets is Ricky is in BLO eating chicken wings already...seriously.
To
Rick Nash ($7.8M until 18-19)
To
Tyler Ennis ($4.6M until 19-20)
Cody Franzon ($3.325 until 17-18)
If Kane can't behave with Buffalo's nightlife, what trouble would he get into living in NYC?
Now if it's Kane and a prospect for Nash and maybe a 3rd, could work for both side BUT does any team want the headache? If you were a GM would you? Too much risk and Kane has only himself to blame.
Kane for Staal as bern suggested makes fairly good sense (can't believe I'm saying this). What do you think Buffalo fans? Maybe we add a sweetener (we have really good goalie prospects, and a lot of them, for example) or retain up to 25% but that would be the base of the deal.
[MOD]
And then Kane's contract is off the books next summer and the Rangers get the cap space.
If he behaves, then the Rangers can resign a talented player.
If we are talking about negative value, lets properly assign it. A guy who has a behavior problem would be that negative value, not a perennial 30 goal scorer on a bad contract. The Rangers would be smart holding on to Nash until the deadline where a contender would pay through the teeth to acquire him. Retaining more salary at that point would make the return even greater. That will likely be what happens.....would I take Kane? Sure but with a couple of prospect ++'s.
NO, b'cause:...
We'd get more sending Nash to Bruins for Chara, J. Hayes, and McAvoy.
If this is to be kept simple, the EKane deal is for M. Staal; I would add Tambellini, a 3rd who looks like he'll make it, and boom bust 3rd Robin Kovacs who is good so far but very preliminary --- these I add only b'c of the dif in years on term of Kane and Staal contracts --- and that's it.
problem child for problem contract
My friend, Savant, I disagree.Both of us know the Bruins aren't doing that.
My friend, Savant, I disagree.
Surely they'd do Chara for Nash in a second.
The cost is what they pay for the privilege, and this is it.
He'd be like Keith Hernandez, Doc Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, Joe Namath, LT, or just about any other highly skilled athlete who like to party. Heck, playing for a winning team, maybe he becomes like Patty Kane or Tyler Seguin.Lets be real here if Kane can't behave in Buffalo imagine what he would be like in NYC lol..
How about Pysyk,E.Kane for
Marc Staal, 1st in 2017
To Buffalo
Rick Nash
Marc Stall 1.75 mil retained
Tanner Glass
To NY Rangers
Matt Moulson
Evander Kane
Cody Franson 1.4 mil retained
Hudson Faschin
Minnesota 2017 2nd
That's an awful deal for the Rangers.
Bern, they're not gonna trade McAvoy. Even though I'd love to be able to talk to Charlie Sr. about Charlie Jr. playing on Broadway, it's not happening.
To Buffalo
Rick Nash
Marc Stall 1.75 mil retained
Tanner Glass
To NY Rangers
Matt Moulson
Evander Kane
Cody Franson 1.4 mil retained
Hudson Faschin
Minnesota 2017 2nd
To Buffalo
Rick Nash
Marc Stall 1.75 mil retained
Tanner Glass
To NY Rangers
Matt Moulson
Evander Kane
Cody Franson 1.4 mil retained
Hudson Faschin
Minnesota 2017 2nd
This is insanely bad for buffalo.....they give up the top 3 pieces in this s deal.
Nash and Staal are being criminally underrated here.
Nash would easily put up 20 goals and most likely 30+ with the offensive talent Buffalo now has.
Staal would instantly be a top 4 dman in Buffalo and his contract would look very nice if Staal even somewhat returns to his shutdown form and a change of scenery with some goals in front of him could do that. He never was and never will be a huge point guy. Hes a defensive defenseman which are very underrated here by the HF armchair gm's who dont watch games and just look at stats.
If Murray could ship out Moulson's contract, Kane's BS, and Franson along with the bench he will be sitting on and possibly get quality players back, he better pull the trigger without hesitation. If all the Sabres have to give up are a decent prospect and one of the many picks they have, its a huge win.