Prospect Info: Bruins Prospects XXV

Marner Zacha Pasta
Desnoyers Mittlstad Geekie
Khustnudinov Lindholm Lysell / Merk
Beecher Kastelic Lauko
xxxxx
Lindholm McAvoy
Zadorov Chychrun
Lohrei Peeke
xxxxxx

Swayman
Dipietro

30-32mil top play?
Marner is from Ontario and loves Toronto.It will take a big overpayment to pry him away from resigning with Leafs.That's my take anyhow.And I see Zacha still in 1st line C spot here which to me is sad.He is not a top line level centre.
 
Dom, why no mention of Wanner's off ice issues? I think that character and behavior should be something that's part of whether or not you hire a player. There is a culture in hockey where people want to bury things having to do with off ice behavior for a variety of reasons, but I would counter that by saying that building a group in the room that respects each other, the fans, and the city they play for is incredibly important.

I can think of reasons why you would omit it, but I would request that you just tell us the whole truth. Because the hockey fans who read about this stuff and already have heard the reporting can tell immediately when that part is omitted. There were many outlets that reported on it. You could certainly do it, too.

As a fan, Wanner's on-ice performance hasn't been that spectacular, so it looks to me like this guy was just someone who needed a fresh start and a change of scenery.
If you have the facts on Warner's off Ice issues feel free to share. If not why the need to stir the pot
 
  • Like
Reactions: bruinsfan1968
If you have the facts on Warner's off Ice issues feel free to share. If not why the need to stir the pot

I just want the reports that are already public to be part of the public discussion on this public person. I'm not suggesting spreading rumors or anything like that. If you are over 18, and you are a public person, your behavior is up for public discussion. That's my take. If someone is worried that they are going to be sued for quoting Katie Strang from the Athletic, well okay. As long as we are not burying the conversation because "he's just a kid" or something like that.

And as an edit, somebody ought to ask him directly what happened.
 
I just want the reports that are already public to be part of the public discussion on this public person. I'm not suggesting spreading rumors or anything like that. If you are over 18, and you are a public person, your behavior is up for public discussion. That's my take. If someone is worried that they are going to be sued for quoting Katie Strang from the Athletic, well okay. As long as we are not burying the conversation because "he's just a kid" or something like that.

And as an edit, somebody ought to ask him directly what happened.

Youre fishing for hearsay. If someone takes the bait it will cost them.
If you have such great interest continue your research elsewhere.

We have taken the position here that something occurred when he was a teen. It broke team rules. It was not considered criminal. He was reinstated.

End of our discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bruinmann77

Ad

Ad