Its not about liking nor supporting Simmons its simply explaining why Burke was fired for the way he carried himself publicly and how that rubbed MLSE the wrong way when it comes to corporate branding and image.
When you work for these large billion dollar conglomerations your conduct is not free will based as appropriate behaviour, but rather corporate based and directed instead. A loose cannon as Burke is, is not desirable as we found out this week by his dismissal.
As Burke said, if you are winning you can be as obnoxious as you want to be. If Burke was successful, and had playoff appearances, do you think he would be let go? A "loose cannon" would be very desirable if you are winning, which probably makes them more of an quirky individual than a loose cannon.
Burke's track record is pretty damned good before Toronto, loose cannons don't win Stanley Cups.
However, you are correct in that no doubt the new regime, run by the private sector rather than the public by default teachers Pension plan, will have their own ideas on accountability.
Pretty good article here on the subject..
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/maple-leaf-sports-and-entertainment-we-are-hitting-the-reset-button/article7265097/
"We are hitting the reset button,” said a source close to MLSE’s board, speaking on condition of anonymity, about the significance of the firing of Mr. Burke. Long-time understudy, Dave Nonis, has been handed the GM reins, but that is more of a battlefield promotion than a deliberate succession plan.
Though BCE and Rogers are now facing heavy criticism for the optics of making hasty moves, the companies are of the belief that if the teams
return to winning, “it will cure all blemishes,” the source said.