Crease
Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
- Jul 12, 2004
- 24,766
- 27,709
Brendan Smith being solid at forward is both incredibly hilarious and incredibly Brendan Smith
He had been playing out of position for 7 years.
Brendan Smith being solid at forward is both incredibly hilarious and incredibly Brendan Smith
He had been playing out of position for 7 years.
I would bring him back in that role and not as the 13th forward, but the 12th and have him continue to be the 7th defenseman who can and does PK during games.Smith would be one of those guys who would bring some much needed versatility and cost effectiveness to any team if he was making ~$1.25m as he could be both a 13th forward AND a 7th defensemen. In a tight cap world that's valuable
Sorry I don’t recall what you are referring to when posting in a Brendan Smith thread. Was I some huge Smith advocate? Because I know I was not.
Just because he is playing doesn’t mean he should be playing there. If anything he should be on the 4th line until someone can displace him but unfortunately we dont have anyone at the moment to do so. McKegg should be in there over him but DQ has an infatuation with Smith for some reason. He loves that he can put him on D for the PK but that is not enough reasoning for him to be in the lineup. He has terrible hands and is slow on the forecheck. McKegg can do a better job and with time we could have a winger emerge from Hartford with how well they have played under Knoblauch.Yeah, no. You told me, I should never post again in the roster building thread, because I put Smith in the line up as FWD, specially on the 3rd line.
Now he did play there, and will keeping FWD. Just wanted to see, what you think now.![]()
To come here and claim how right you were is so incredibly foolish and naive.
I provided you with a whole response of feedback on the Smith front and the surrounding factors that could change things soon because he is quite terrible as a forward and an NHLer in general.lmao, aren't you a lovely person. I never claimed I was right, I was just looking if you had changed your opinion, but seems more of a personality issue here.
The only thing foolish and naive, was only to think you may reconsider your position.
I like the idea of Gettinger. He seemed to play full speed every shift he was up with the rangers. I also like smith.Maybe--but to me someone like Tim Gettinger is tailor made for a bottom 6 role and he's never going to be a top 6. Gettinger could be a very effective 4th liner ala a kind of Brian Boyle for the wing. That's the kind of player that would push Smith out of job. Gettinger has great size, pretty good skating, can play a physical game, has great reach and those qualities could add up to a really good 4th line/penalty killer who could put up 20 points a year.
As far as Smith's switching ability from forward to D---we have such a glut of promising young defensemen that I'd rather not just let them all wallow in the AHL for the sake of a 30-something year old. It's useful his being able to switch but I wouldn't be holding up the progress of our prospects for that kind of a tradeoff.
So if we're resigning Brendan Smith--it's a temporary thing. 1 year--$1 mil and if we're not it's because our prospects are ready to push him out.
I like the idea of Gettinger. He seemed to play full speed every shift he was up with the rangers. I also like smith.
Yep. We need vets. Not necessarily pricey ones though. But I’d be cool with Smith and Fast and even Strome if he’s willing be a - god forbid - $1.5m bottom sixer. What a worldI'm alright for resigning Smith in two years if he's still playing well.....but also 1 year at a time and low cap.
Umm.... I do not really think that you can compare Strome to Smith and Fast. Strome is showing a lot more.Yep. We need vets. Not necessarily pricey ones though. But I’d be cool with Smith and Fast and even Strome if he’s willing be a - god forbid - $1.5m bottom sixer. What a world![]()
Umm.... I do not really think that you can compare Strome to Smith and Fast. Strome is showing a lot more.
There’s no one on the current roster I want gone, come to think of it. That’s a first for me. Even Staal. I want him to be the 7th D. But I don’t want him gone. Even Haley, he plays every shift as if it were his last. I love that.
I don’t dislike McKegg at all. He’s way better than the Pyatts and McLeods and Glasses we’ve seen recently. But I totally agree on Haley. He is a real Comet. That should be his nickname, actually.Haley shouldn't be an every game player but he comes in handy against heavier teams. I don't throw around the world 'fearless' very often but he's pretty much a definition of that word. His competition for 12th forward is Greg McKegg and McKegg to me is borderline too. If we had someone better than McKegg I might want that player in the lineup more than Haley but I prefer Haley's 5-7 minutes over McKegg's 7-9 minutes.
I like McKegg's hustle and speed in chasing down pucks. But he has a knack for following that up by falling down, over-stickhandling, or, once again, falling down.Haley shouldn't be an every game player but he comes in handy against heavier teams. I don't throw around the world 'fearless' very often but he's pretty much a definition of that word. His competition for 12th forward is Greg McKegg and McKegg to me is borderline too. If we had someone better than McKegg I might want that player in the lineup more than Haley but I prefer Haley's 5-7 minutes over McKegg's 7-9 minutes.
McKegg should be in there over him but DQ has an infatuation with Smith for some reason. He loves that he can put him on D for the PK but that is not enough reasoning for him to be in the lineup. He has terrible hands and is slow on the forecheck. McKegg can do a better job and with time we could have a winger emerge from Hartford with how well they have played under Knoblauch.
I am more than fine having Haley and Smith flank whomever on the 4th lineThere’s no one on the current roster I want gone, come to think of it. That’s a first for me. Even Staal. I want him to be the 7th D. But I don’t want him gone. Even Haley, he plays every shift as if it were his last. I love that.
He is getting his name on the scoresheet now and every since he came to NY. The center/wing versatility is great. Sometimes a player needs a change. He changes his team, changed his game got comfort and confidence and dare I say a coach to whom he responds to.Strome isn't always very good at keeping up with his linemates--10 points in 10 games though is pretty good. If he can hit 50 points this year as a 2c that ain't bad. He's got good offensive instincts even if his feet are a little slow. He's one of those guys you don't notice very much but still manage to get their name on the scoresheet.
I like McKegg's hustle and speed in chasing down pucks. But he has a knack for following that up by falling down, over-stickhandling, or, once again, falling down.