Whadda ya mean "acquires"? That'll be the Canes pick.When Waddell acquires the 31st pick
Skej looked very promising why did he seem to fall off from like 2 years ago. I'll admit this is just form looking at his stats.
Everybody loved the Gardiner acquisition, too. Media guys tend to overlook most of the warts on the deal days.I've listened to the Chiclets guys, Ej Hradek and some others on sportsnet/nhl network. The consensus is that Skjei is a good player and most believe it was a fair trade. In other words literally everybody that is not a Rangers fan likes the trade.
I've listened to the Chiclets guys, Ej Hradek and some others on sportsnet/nhl network. The consensus is that Skjei is a good player and most believe it was a fair trade. In other words literally everybody that is not a Rangers fan likes the trade.
Thats fair but i also think majority of the posters on this board are being over dramatic about Gardiner. He unfortunately took the scapegoat title because of his poor play early on. His recent play has been much better. Just my opinion.Everybody loved the Gardiner acquisition, too. Media guys tend to overlook most of the warts on the deal days.
Thats fair but i also think majority of the posters on this board are being over dramatic about Gardiner. He unfortunately took the scapegoat title because of his poor play early on. His recent play has been much better. Just my opinion.
Well, to be fair, we only have to integrate two at the moment. Vats is not yet ready to play.In that vein, I'm very concerned about integrating 3 new guys in the heat of a playoff race, no matter how good they might ultimately be -- but we'll see.
Well, to be fair, we only have to integrate two at the moment. Vats is not yet ready to play.
Well, the forward likely won't be much worse than the poor play he was replacing, so that's good. The D is a concern, but not one we had much of a choice about. Worry about integrating talented new players or worry about integrating AHLers. Could be challenging either way.In that vein, I'm very concerned about integrating 3 new guys in the heat of a playoff race, no matter how good they might ultimately be -- but we'll see.
I don't agree there. We replace Haula with Trocheck which is a new piece, but probably better overall performance. But we are also essentially replacing Wally with Dzingle (last healthy scratch). That is not an integration issue, but certainly Wally was playing much better than Dzingle in most areas of play.Well, the forward likely won't be much worse than the poor play he was replacing, so that's good.
What about disintegration?And one of them is necessary - we would’ve had to fill a D spot from Charlotte anyway which also would’ve been “integration.”
Hm, I guess that's a way to look at it, but I'm just slightly more concerned with what's ostensibly the 2C position than the 4C position. So I don't care even if that is the case? I think Marty will be fine as 4C and Dzingel has still played the majority of the games, so he's not really replacing anyone to me.I don't agree there. We replace Haula with Trocheck which is a new piece, but probably better overall performance. But we are also essentially replacing Wally with Dzingle (last healthy scratch). That is not an integration issue, but certainly Wally was playing much better than Dzingle in most areas of play.
Hmmm, ok. Put Dzingel out on the PK. I think we'll see a difference then.I think Wallmark is great but him and Dzingel is a wash. Dzingel playing poorly is still on pace for 35 pts.
Hmmm, ok. Put Dzingel out on the PK. I think we'll see a difference then.
He seemed to crack under the pressure of playing in NYC with that big contract. He had a great first year with us. I really do not know of any other reason why his play took a few big steps back. Maybe a change of scenery is what he needs. Maybe he'll be fine when not on the first pairing. We'll see.Skej looked very promising why did he seem to fall off from like 2 years ago. I'll admit this is just form looking at his stats.