ClarkSittler
Registered User
- Mar 25, 2014
- 1,788
- 3,177
I can read just fine. Everything you said above is laughably wrong. Their cup winning D wasn't soft and all cup winning teams in the last decade had at least 4 big defenceman."Colorado had the best playoff record in the last decade with one of the softest defenses in the league, thinking you need big tough D to win is wrong."
Can't read.
You claimed they had the best playoff record in the last decade because of their smaller defense. So it wasn't because of the small defense? Why did you bother responding in the first place then?Nowhere did I say they were great because of having smaller D, but Colorado put more value in their smallest D over their bigger D that year.
So, not soft and average size, well I guess softer, smaller D don't lead to winning the most playoff games in a decade. Thanks for clearing that up.Not soft, average size at best, but slightly under.
And he played twice as many games during their cup run. Why would I not use him?Sure use him, he was their 7th choice, Girard was their 4th.
I see so 6'1 205 lbs is below average and not big. Well I guess we found the problem then.Slightly below average, but sure.
Oh now, it's D core lol. Way to move the goalposts.Ignoring that this D core was not close to being big or mean is your issue, not mine.
That team won based on possession and skill, sorry if you missed the playoffs.
I already proved 2/3 rds of the defense was at least average or bigger. Still waiting on that evidence showing all the soft, smaller defense on cup winning teams. I'm sure you're working on that now.