neelynugs
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 35,720
- 10,914
3/12? i'd prefer to go year by year like they did with a lot of the core vets in the past, butYears? Cap hit?
4M is pretty reasonable IMO. seems like 63 wants term
3/12? i'd prefer to go year by year like they did with a lot of the core vets in the past, butYears? Cap hit?
63.2 points is my calculation.He's on pace for what 60-70 pts.
What's that worth in this league?
What's that worth on the market? I'm thinking more than what folks in here are offering.63.2 points is my calculation.
I certainly don't know, but I'm assuming other teams know the Bruins don't have much leverage at the moment.Whenever a media post or headline is framed as a question, the answer is usually "no".
What's that worth on the market? I'm thinking more than what folks in here are offering.
I don't follow. Leverage for what?I certainly don't know, but I'm assuming other teams know the Bruins don't have much leverage at the moment.
Nevermind, wrong word. I just feel like other teams are aware the Bruins may be in desperation.I don't follow. Leverage for what?
yeah you can't do that. if this thing goes totally off the rails and he doesn't sign, you're looking at aIt would be hard sell for me to trade Marchand for a 2nd round pick. Just seems like a horrible return.
Yeah unless he randomly retires, i hope he stays at a reasonable # IF he can still lead the team and him and his family are still in a place they want to be.yeah you can't do that. if this thing goes totally off the rails and he doesn't sign, you're looking at a
claude giroux type of return when the flyers sent him to florida with a couple of warm bodies and
a 5th round pick. philly got a 1st round pick, owen tippett (who was a very good prospect at the time)
and a 3rd rounder.
but i'm signing this guy all day long and twice on sunday. too important to deal (unless they do some
type of thing like keith tkachuk did with the blues, where they traded him and then he signed with them
on july 1).