Proposal: Bouch for Chabot

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,806
31,743
I have some doubt you see beyond the Oilers logo when it comes to Edmonton players. As I recall you recently just suggested the Oilers trade Matt Savoie to Nashville for Fabbro (for the Preds to even consider it!) hours before he went on waivers for free.
Nope.
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,577
55,555
I'm sure you would....because you've seen Sanderson play I'm guessing thrice in your life.
Yeh and you saw some isolated highlights of Bouch and think he’s horrible defensively. Probably didn’t see his GENERATIONAL playoff run either where he outplayed the likes of Huges and Heiskanen at both ends of the ice.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
27,547
7,123
Yeh and you saw some isolated highlights of Bouch and think he’s horrible defensively. Probably didn’t see his GENERATIONAL playoff run either where he outplayed the likes of Huges and Heiskanen at both ends of the ice.
I did indeed and I have seen him enough to know he's not close to Sanderson defensively. Offensively? Yes. Defensively? Nope.
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,577
55,555
I did indeed and I have seen him enough to know he's not close to Sanderson defensively. Offensively? Yes. Defensively? Nope.
Defence is played at both ends of the ice. The best defenceman this game has ever seen and will ever see, have always been 2-way defenceman with a huge bias towards offence. Bouchard is fine defensively, he was one half of the best defensive pair last year. Where did Sanderson rank? Will Sanderson ever put up Brian Leetch/Paul Coffey numbers in the playoffs? Doubtful.
 

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,806
31,743
I did indeed and I have seen him enough to know he's not close to Sanderson defensively. Offensively? Yes. Defensively? Nope.
He makes for a pretty good pylon, especially when not being coddled by Ekholm. Any defenceman asking for something in the 10 million range shouldn’t need a babysitter on the ice. If he can’t improve defensively it’s high risk for turning into a bad contract if a team can’t feed him offensive opportunities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpezDispenser

PuckG

Registered User
Feb 26, 2015
4,377
6,253
He makes for a pretty good pylon, especially when not being coddled by Ekholm. Any defenceman asking for something in the 10 million range shouldn’t need a babysitter on the ice. If he can’t improve defensively it’s high risk for turning into a bad contract if a team can’t feed him offensive opportunities.
That “pylon” outplayed Hughes and Heiskanen in games that matter most just this past off-season. Hughes, in particular, got caved in the playoffs - brutal all around performance from a Norris winner. Is he a pylon too?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,589
31,464
Edmonton
Do you?

And once again, for the record, it should be noted that you think Bouchard is a better defender than Sanderson. Just for the lols sake.
All around, Bouchard is better. Factor in playoff performances, handedness, and team need and Edmonton doesn’t even remotely consider trading them 1 for 1. Even if Bouchard gets 10M+.

Credibility was lost after this, hard to take you serious now.
No that’s pretty accurate. All things considered Edmonton turns down Bouchard for Chabot+2 1sts. Makes zero sense.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,422
13,701
All around, Bouchard is better. Factor in playoff performances, handedness, and team need and Edmonton doesn’t even remotely consider trading them 1 for 1. Even if Bouchard gets 10M+.


No that’s pretty accurate. All things considered Edmonton turns down Bouchard for Chabot+2 1sts. Makes zero sense.

Offensively I take Bouch
Defending I take Sanderson

Shot is Bouch

Skating is Sanderson
 

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,511
17,151
Edmonton
This is a horrendous deal for the Oilers. They already have Ekholm and Nurse on the left side and nothing after Bouchard on the right side.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
27,547
7,123
All around, Bouchard is better. Factor in playoff performances, handedness, and team need and Edmonton doesn’t even remotely consider trading them 1 for 1. Even if Bouchard gets 10M+.


No that’s pretty accurate. All things considered Edmonton turns down Bouchard for Chabot+2 1sts. Makes zero sense.
Ffs, it's not all around. It's all around to you, maybe, but not to people who watch Sanderson.
 

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,806
31,743
This is a horrendous deal for the Oilers. They already have Ekholm and Nurse on the left side and nothing after Bouchard on the right side.
That’s a fair argument, you’d be forced to play someone of their off side which could be disastrous.
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,589
31,464
Edmonton
Ffs, it's not all around. It's all around to you, maybe, but not to people who watch Sanderson.
Bouchard has better underlying numbers with Adam Henrique than Sanderson does with Tim Stutzle. Sanderson is a fine young player, but he's not in Bouchard's league yet. It wasn't an accident that Bouch finished top 5 in Norris voting.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
27,547
7,123
Bouchard has better underlying numbers with Adam Henrique than Sanderson does with Tim Stutzle. Sanderson is a fine young player, but he's not in Bouchard's league yet. It wasn't an accident that Bouch finished top 5 in Norris voting.
I have no issue with someone saying Bouchard is better than Sanderson, what I have issue with is anyone saying he's better defensively. Because he's not.

I also think their values aren't vastly dissimilar, but that's neither here nor there in this thread.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,636
3,219
No worth the hassle. We can trade Chabot elsewhere and avoid the headache that Oilers about to go through.
If you think it would be "too much of a hassle" for your GM to do his job and negotiate a contract, a trade, or arbitration, to the point where you would prefer to pass on, in this case, multiple 1sts of extra value, you should be calling for said GM to be fired today.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,422
13,701
If you think it would be "too much of a hassle" for your GM to do his job and negotiate a contract, a trade, or arbitration, to the point where you would prefer to pass on, in this case, multiple 1sts of extra value, you should be calling for said GM to be fired today.
Then you guys trade for him, if you think it’s great.
Remember this thread proposal was from an Oilers fan.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad