Agreed. But, the disconnect between Gillis and Aquaman was likely how quickly the mindset of Gillis changes from 2012 to 2013. Obviously something needed to change for the Canucks. They were not going to win a cup with that core group given the changing style to big and heavy.The story here isn't the potential return, it's the change in mindset and a setting of a new vision for the future of the team.
The rumored offer for Kesler was Sutter, 1st round pick, choice of Dumolin, Harrington or Despres. Rumor was deal fell through because Gillis wanted Pouliot instead.
It's funny that people believe this story about ownership intervening in Gillis' moves and blame Benning for not getting anything for Hamhuis because they don't want to believe in the story that Benning had struck a deal only to return with a higher demand after speaking to ownership.
I don't believe Gillis would have accepted an all futures trade for Kesler. The asking price for Kesler always involved a young roster player, 1st round pick + prospect. That is in line with the asking price of other star-calibre players.
According to Jason Botchford on tsn1040 this morning that he knows for a 100% fact that Gillis had an accepted offer to trade Kesler at the 2014 Trade Deadline to Pittsburgh but was ultimately Veto'd by Aqualini as the ownership did not want to embrace a rebuild. Gillis was of course fired a couple of months later.
It wasnt only until Kesler and his agent demanded a trade out of Vancouver on the summer of 2014 that forced Aqualini to give in and give the green light for new GM Benning to move Kesler...however Aqualini still wasnt up for a rebuild and instructed Benning and Linden to get roster players as a return.
Botchford did not give names on what the return would have been from Pitt for Kesler but alluded that the Canucks would be in a much much better position today had that trade gone through.
**Botchford specifically said that it wasn't for Derick Pouliot as Pitt considered him untouchable lol**
Looking at the 2014 Pens roster , I'm not sure who they would have offered for Kesler that would have been a home run return
It couldn't have been for Kasperi Kapanen because he wasnt drafted until that summer. Although that 1st rnd pick was surely offered to the Canucks.
- Matt Murray ?
- Olli Matta ?
- Brian Dumolin
- Scott Harrington
- Beau Bennet
- Brandon Suter . Lol
Non of these are home run picks
They had nice roster pieces but i doubt Pitt offers Letang or a then 25 yr old James Neal
I'm almost certain that the Pitt offer was a 1st rnd pick, multiple 2nds and a prospect.
Why is it that a team like Colorado can be patient for almost a year until they get the right deal for Duchene, and then pull the trigger on a three team deal that nets them a bounty of assets, including the possibility of the first overall pick this spring.
Meantime the Canucks, who were trading an asset in Kesler who at that point in his career was just as good as Duchene, can't get more than a fourth line center; a scrub blueliner and a pick at the back half of the first round?
If the reason is a 'meddling owner' than he should fire himself.
Not to mention Bonino was a clear cut 2C here and again in Pits while Malkin was mostly hurt his first season there.You do realize that Duchene was 26 years old with no NTC. Kesler was soon to be 30 years old with full NTC right?
Canucks have been through several basic misunderstanding of the game situations. All the Coaches and GMs can't be dumb.It has to be Aquilini. Nobody else has been there that long. I feel this dooms the franchise.
I thought this rumor was already out there? Maybe I'm just recollecting something similar.
Anyways, this is all just par for the course for this dysfunctional organization. In retrospect it's probably why the Aquilini's keep hiring inexperienced executives. They won't automatically resign when ownership starts messing around with hockey ops. Doesn't excuse Benning, who's not playing with a full GM skill set, but it does all make sense.
Judging by his drafting record..I’d shudder to think.I wonder where this team would be if we were in the timeline where Gillis stayed and was allowed to rebuild.
Judging by his drafting record..I’d shudder to think.
Judging by his drafting record..I’d shudder to think.
This was reported at the time, here's a source:
"a proposed deal would send Kesler to the Penguins in exchange for center Brandon Sutter, two 2014 draft picks — likely a first- and third-round — and the Canucks’ choice of defensemen Simon Despres or Brian Dumoulin, the sources said."
Penguins identify Canucks’ Kesler as top trade target | TribLIVE.com
That 1st round pick became Kapanen, but I imagine the Canucks still pick McCann there.
Judging by his drafting record..I’d shudder to think.
Horvat and Hutton have been pretty useless lately eh?
That's 2 out of a countless dozen, I still feel meh about Nik Jensen I thought he was gonna be a good player
He was too busy winning President Cups trophies.Yeah, Gillis did take too long to revamp the scouting department - that's always been his biggest knock. But when he did in 2013, including hiring Judd Brackett, we've looked pretty good since. Benning just stumbled into the job and reaped the benefits, but even then he found a way to screw up easy picks in Virtanen and Juolevi. Pretty much all of our good picks have come from Benning deferring to scouts that existed during the Gillis regime.
Yeah, Gillis did take too long to revamp the scouting department - that's always been his biggest knock. But when he did in 2013, including hiring Judd Brackett, we've looked pretty good since. Benning just stumbled into the job and reaped the benefits, but even then he found a way to screw up easy picks in Virtanen and Juolevi. Pretty much all of our good picks have come from Benning deferring to scouts that existed during the Gillis regime.