Pengu
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2016
- 1,231
- 683
Good because he provides less than half the offence OEL provides. And less defence to boot. Comparing him to OEL is really weird. OEL might not have the numbers he did earlier in his career but I don’t think you’ve watched any Arizona games. He’s still a very skilled dman and much better than Carlo.Carlo will be due 24.6m over six years—or, in other words, he is due 0.5 OELs over six years.
Good because he provides less than half the offence OEL provides. And less defence to boot. Comparing him to OEL is really weird. OEL might not have the numbers he did earlier in his career but I don’t think you’ve watched any Arizona games. He’s still a very skilled dman and much better than Carlo.
This is a very sensible deal, for both parties.
It does the Isles a favor by giving them a starting point but Pelech > Carlo by a bit. Im a big fan of both. Maybe 5.1 for Pelech.Wonder if this sets the bar for the Islanders and Adam Pelech. Similar defensive defensemen.
Not much can justify that contract. Even if he performs to his ceiling it’s too high.Good contract, unlike the Coyle one....
I was just stating a numerical fact.
For example, during the next six years, I will get paid less than 0.02 OELs. I provide less offense and less defense than OEL (or Carlo) too.
Really only big question is health, because value wise it's great.
Sucks when one of your top D is always injured and you're trying to keep contending with an aging core.
Donny the master . Excellent and cheap real cheap.
Haven't watched Carlo a lot. I'd assume he brings a lot more to the table than his offensive output would indicate?
Worth every penny. He will be healthy and is gonna stop players like Mathews in his tracts .there's nothing cheap about the deal.
he's a mid pairing defensive defensemen with size that plays with zero physicality amd has no offense.
1 mill per year or so too high.