Speculation: - Boeser signing with Minnesota? | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: Boeser signing with Minnesota?

I think it’s Kypreos’ way of saying he’s going to Minnesota.

Can an agent discuss contract (no pen to paper offers) with a team without violating the tampering rules?
That’s tampering. Kypreos isn’t credible, and the Boeser Minnesota narrative writes itself. hometown kid, lifelong Wild fan, family reasons. Uninspired take and lazy take.
 
Hope there’s a plan on the Canucks end. Overpaying Boeser was never going to be ideal but the FA market seems thin and the Canucks need to compete.
Sounds like they're doubling back on Suter which isn't a bad option given how he really stepped up last year. Prior to his concussion, Boeser looked like he was gonna expand on his 2023-24 season but that unfortunately didn't happen. I can see why the Canucks aren't comfortable committing to a long term contract even though he'd probably shell 25+ and the Canucks absolutely need more scoring in the top 6. He gets a little too much hate but put him beside a speedy center with some vision and he'll score 30+ IF he's healthy and the concussion symptoms have 100% resolved.

With the market looking bare, I could see Minnesota sending 6-7x$8 million contract Bowser's way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BKarchitect
Could be allowed by the Canucks to seek a trade for his player rights and 8 year contract.
Pretty sure that they changed that rule so that you can only sign for 8yrs if you are on the team by the trade deadline.

The benefit to a rights trade is that you get cost certainty on a “core” acquisition before FA opens, and you dont need to spend time and manpower on it during the “frenzy”
 
  • Like
Reactions: DigitalBoldy
I feel like he’s gonna age terribly.

Not a very wild like player either.
He's already slow so it might not be a terrible decline if he stays healthy. He's not a goal scorer who has ever relied on speed.

I get why folks love Ehlers aesthetically and are excited about him versus the rather dour outlook on Boeser but frankly Boeser's end results over the last three seasons are similar, if not better in many regards (he misses less time and has been more effective in the playoffs)...and Boeser is almost a full year younger.

I think he's actually a bit underrated at this point - it seems more folks are like "we don't want him!" than actually have interest in him. I get the hesitation over paying big money to a free agent but that won't simply be a Brock Boeser issue and the rising cap helps for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurgeon
Losing Boeser for nothing and Miller for next to nothing has to hurt the franchise going forward. Bad asset management by Vancouver.

They’ll need assets to make trades and overpaying free agents to fill a roster like Trotz did with Nashville doesn’t always work out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad