How exactly could 50-goals scorer turn to excellent 4th line guy?
What's the story behind this?
Has such a dramatic turnaround any historical comparision?
if you asked jacques lemaire, he'd probably say, "i convinced bobby to use his gifts for good [defense] instead of evil [scoring]."
carpenter did have a bit of an offensive renaissance after going to boston for steve kasper and providing them with valuable secondary scoring behind the neely/janney line. he couldn't replace the playoff production or defensive game that kasper gave boston in 80s though. that was one of the big reasons the Bs lost to the oilers in the finals in '90-- nobody other than neely, janney, and bourque could put the puck in the net, so once tikkanen-lamb-kurri shut down boston's top line, it was over.
Although he was never a 50 goal scorer, Joe Juneau had a similar twist to his career. He netted 19 points in his first 14 games, then the following season scored 102 points. Juneau followed that performance with an 85 point season, but was dealt from Boston to Washington at the trade deadline for Al Iafrate.
After being dealt, Juneau's production gradually decreased. He was still about a point per game player during the lockout season, scoring 43 points in 44 games. Juneau eventually became a checking line center.
Neal Broten also had a similar career path as Bobby Carpenter, being a former high scoring center, then later in his career becoming a more defensive minded center.
This was the playoff strategy for years vs the Bruins.
(1) Double team and harass Neely into the penalty box. He can't score from there.
(2) Run Bourque at every chance. Force him to make a hasty mistake and wear him down.
Do this and you had a very good chance to beat them.
Generally, after the top 2 lines it was slim scoring and occasional defensive lapses on the 3rd and 4th lines.
87-88 had them playing essentially 3 lines and 2 defensive pairings.
89-90 saw Bourque injured at one point, (missing 4 games), and Neely the only player in double figures in goal scoring. (He led the team in scoring and PIMs that playoff season). Dave Poulin actually had a tremendous playoff run and was 2nd in goal scoring with 8. John Carter was 3rd with 6, but if I remember correctly, most of them were in the earlier rounds.
Carpenter was rotated in and around between wing and center as the 3rd line center Bob Sweeney was a woeful 0-2-2 (-7) in 20 playoff games. He had played respectably but you're right, he couldn't replace Kasper and the 3rd and 4th lines were inept and other than Bourque and Wesley, the other defensive pairings had a rough time, especially against the Edmonton final....Don Sweeney, in his first ever playoffs, had his worst ever playoff showing.
as i recall, other than neely and bourque in the first couple of games, no one on the Bs scored at all in those finals. seems like losing poulin in the finals made a big difference.
like poulin, carpenter also produced at a decent clip through the first three rounds, but then he was completely blanked in the finals (as was propp). carpenter didn't yet have the defensive game that poulin or propp also brought though.
. . .
Christian, Gould, Janney and Propp had no points at all.
3rd and 4th liners Johnston, Byce, Carter and Byers scored, (blowing my claim out of the water).
Just a very frustrating series for Bruins players and fans.
It was his attitude and work ethic in the early years, he was cocky, arrogant, and lazy. When he found out he was being drafted by Washington and not Hartford, he stormed out of the building. When the coach in Washington demanded more of him he went home and pouted until he was traded. Phil Kessel x1000. It changed when he got to Boston after 3 other teams had enough of him, but he really took it to another level when he got hurt and had to completely reinvent himself, a shame he didn't figure it out sooner.Was a can't miss kid who all of a sudden hit a slump and couldn't get out of it. Never really regained his confidence nor the confidence of some coaches, he may have wilted under the pressure, (he was only 21 when he peaked at 53 goals in his 4th NHL season), basically because he was just a kid.
Bounced around for a little while but never really regained his scoring magic, he missed most of the 90/91 season after shattering his knee cap, which never really healed properly and robbed him of some agility and speed.
Afterwards he remade himself into a defensive specialist, using his smarts and hockey sense, as well as above average face off skills when he went to Jacques Lemaire's defensive schemed NJ Devils, only once coming close to playing an entire injury free season.
He got old?
I believe he was the first American born player to sore 50 in a year. I couldn't believe it took that long for one to hit 50....
This was 1984. Who should have scored 50 prior to that? Robbie Ftorek? He needed to go to the WHA to accomplish that feat, but never even close in the NHL. There just weren't any Americans good enough to do it back then, the USA was a borderline laughingstock when it came to hockey back then. Afterwards, Lafontaine, Mullen, etc. made the 50 goal season for an American a little less of a novelty.
By the way, isn't everyone forgetting the biggest reason for Carpenter's 50 goal year? Wasn't he Mike Gartner's linemate that season?
He certainly did according to his bio page here, http://www.hockeydraftcentral.com/1981/81003.html
Carpenter's 53 goal is season is both a massive outlier and a great example of why one should consider the context of stats whenever possible. Bryan Murray, of all people, had a team with some serious offensive talent but basically no defense except Ryan walter up front, so he opened up the offense completely.
By the way, isn't everyone forgetting the biggest reason for Carpenter's 50 goal year? Wasn't he Mike Gartner's linemate that season?
Yeah I thought so. And that might just be the reason right there. I mean, people pick on Gartner a lot around here, but the while he too had a 50 goal season and never reached that again, he was a perennial 40 goal man his whole career regardless of where he played. He had 15 straight seasons of 33 or more goals which puts him at a minimum 35 goal man category every year. Could it be that the biggest reason Carpenter had that surge was that he had a HHOF winger on his line that took a lot of attention away from him opening up plenty more room? Gartner had a career high of 52 assists that year while Carpenter had 53 goals. You can't spell it out any better than that
was gartner not also carpenter's linemate in '86, when his scoring fell back to earth? or in carpenter's second year in the league?
looking at the stats, they clearly had something special that year. but why not the other two years they played together? i'm not sure gartner's presence fully explains it. carpenter almost doubled his previous career high in ES goals (41), and his shooting percentage was way higher than at any other point in his career (20.4), both are great numbers. but can we say with any kind of certainty that gartner did that? maybe carpenter was just on a hot streak, and gifted gartner his extra 10 assists that year?
I don't think you understand the question.Gary Leeman says hi
By the way, isn't everyone forgetting the biggest reason for Carpenter's 50 goal year? Wasn't he Mike Gartner's linemate that season?