See, it isn't food for thought. That is my literal objection. I was very clear about it. You are getting closer. There is almost nothing to compare the '19 Blues and '24 Oilers other than they are both hockey teams in the NHL.
And none of that matters. We are comparing a single metric here: which turnaround was more impressive. That's it. It's not a complex question.
You are free to explain why you think one or the other was more impressive, but it simply is not relevant that the teams are very different. It is
such a common practice to compare things that are very different. The point is that there are often times a couple things that are similar between those two different things, and that's what is being compared.
One example would be two teams that are built very differently, they play a different style, they're in different divisions, they are teams from different seasons, they are from different countries, but they have a few things in common in that they had a bad start, fired their coach, and made it to the Cup Final. These two teams are mostly different, but I'd like you to discuss the similarities of those two teams and which you think had a more impressive turnaround. Ok go. (
please, I'm begging you.)