Mikkola or Scandella. I'd love if we could move Krug too. But I can't see that having until next off season.So which of our LDs is going to be traded out soon? Still one too many. Hope Scandella…
Mikkola or Scandella. I'd love if we could move Krug too. But I can't see that having until next off season.So which of our LDs is going to be traded out soon? Still one too many. Hope Scandella…
Still think Mikkola could grow, and two more years of Scandella and that ass contract.Mikkola or Scandella. I'd love if we could move Krug too. But I can't see that having until next off season.
Sounds like it was a three way race between Florida, Carolina, and STL.Does anyone think Florida’s package was so big because they had to outbid a good package from Armstrong? They had to be bidding against someone.
Tkachuk at 9.5M would have been disruptive, but it’s the right years of his career to make that gamble on. I would have been cautiously optimistic with that. But add in a large price in trade and my enthusiasm goes down a lot. I’m glad St Louis didn‘t lose something like that.
I think Calgary getting That 2025 pick (is there protection?) is a mixed blessing for them. Too far out to help for a long time, but has potential to be a lottery pick since a lot can happen by then.
Does anyone think Florida’s package was so big because they had to outbid a good package from Armstrong? They had to be bidding against someone.
Tkachuk at 9.5M would have been disruptive, but it’s the right years of his career to make that gamble on. I would have been cautiously optimistic with that. But add in a large price in trade and my enthusiasm goes down a lot. I’m glad St Louis didn‘t lose something like that.
I think Calgary getting That 2025 pick (is there protection?) is a mixed blessing for them. Too far out to help for a long time, but has potential to be a lottery pick since a lot can happen by then.
Not you who repeatedly said he be available in free agency next year.Tkachuk signed long term for lots of real world cash because he knew his chances of repeating last season's performance were near zero. Who could have seen that coming?
You guys have terrible reading comprehension. I said it's better to wait and pick him up in FA if he's available than it is to spend assets on him now.Not you who repeatedly said he be available in free agency next year.
Why wouldn't we just wait and find out?We better hope Neighbors and Bolduc are legitimate top 6 players in the next couple years
So…you say the Blues should’ve done whatever they had to to get MT but then also admit they couldn’t really have beaten FLA’s offer. Do you see how that’s nonsensical?The eye test has never failed more than Blues fans watching Nick Leddy. That was a horrific extension.
I love being optimistic but let me bring you down to reality.
We had 9 20 goal scorers, an unheard of amount. We were already due for regression to the mean before losing one of the highest volume shooters on the team in Perron. Barbashev and Kyrou are the likeliest options for regression and if Kyrou ain’t scoring, he is actively hurting you.
But it goes beyond that. We were told the window is now right? That’s why we signed Schenn to an inexplicable 8 year contract (that likely forces out ROR btw) to keep the cap number down right?
If the window is now, then you go get a superstar when he’s available regardless of the cost. There’s nothing on this roster that should have been off limits, with the possible exception of Robert Thomas.
We didn’t do that and to be fair, there probably wasn’t anything that could have been done with the offer Florida brilliantly offered. Two high end players but not as good as Tkachuk on expiring deals? Fantastic job by Florida
maybe... FLA figures a Hub extension looks just like the MT extension and they get MT's prime years instead of Hubs mid-30's yearsThey are in tight on cap. Guess they figured weegar and huberdeau woulda cost more and they couldn’t afford.
The eye test has never failed more than Blues fans watching Nick Leddy. That was a horrific extension.
I love being optimistic but let me bring you down to reality.
We had 9 20 goal scorers, an unheard of amount. We were already due for regression to the mean before losing one of the highest volume shooters on the team in Perron. Barbashev and Kyrou are the likeliest options for regression and if Kyrou ain’t scoring, he is actively hurting you.
But it goes beyond that. We were told the window is now right? That’s why we signed Schenn to an inexplicable 8 year contract (that likely forces out ROR btw) to keep the cap number down right?
If the window is now, then you go get a superstar when he’s available regardless of the cost. There’s nothing on this roster that should have been off limits, with the possible exception of Robert Thomas.
We didn’t do that and to be fair, there probably wasn’t anything that could have been done with the offer Florida brilliantly offered. Two high end players but not as good as Tkachuk on expiring deals? Fantastic job by Florida
have to agree and disagreeSo…you say the Blues should’ve done whatever they had to to get MT but then also admit they couldn’t really have beaten FLA’s offer. Do you see how that’s nonsensical?
MT would’ve been nice but not at the expense of decimating the team. Good on Army for passing. Huberdeau didn’t have CGY on his M-NTC list so they didn’t have the NTC restrictions the Blues had.
As for your comments on Leddy, I’ll respectfully disagree. He’s a solid top-4 d-man IMO. And this isn’t the same top-4 we had last season. It’s the same top-4 we had after the trade deadline…which was much better than what we had all season up until that point. So Leddy really helped solidify the top-4.
That said, I’d agree the Blues D as is likely isn’t quite good enough to win a Cup. But the problem isn’t Leddy making $4M. It’s the guys making $6.5M. Actually, Faulk at that price is just fine but not Parayko or Krug. Both of those contacts are set up to look very bad in a few years, especially Parayko’s. We’re only a couple weeks into Parayko’s 8-year extension. Woof.
Now that the Tkachuk saga is permanently over, I can go back to sulking about Perron.
Easily one of Armstrong's worst offseasons.
Just because MT is young does not take away anything about my point about Kyrou. I was just calling out your fluke comment. Was Matthew’s year also a “fluke”?“He’s still young.”
He’s like 5 months younger than Tkachuk and nowhere near the level of player. We couldn’t even trust him to play second line consistently.
You win with depth or superstars. Our depth is eroding and we missed our shot at a superstar
I would never advocate that the team would be better by simply losing Parayko for nothing. He’s a good player, just not worth $6.5M for the next 8 years. What I’m advocating for is better d-men in place of Parayko and Krug. Or at least upgrading one of them.have to agree and disagree
we've seen what this team looks like without Parayko, and it's not good.. at all
I get that folks have higher expectations from the guy, but he's pretty darn good and eats a ton of tough time on ice
now Krug.. you have a good point. agree, I don't think that contract is gonna age well.. at all
I would never advocate that the team would be better by simply losing Parayko for nothing. He’s a good player, just not worth $6.5M for the next 8 years. What I’m advocating for is better d-men in place of Parayko and Krug. Or at least upgrading one of them.
That of course, is much easier said than done, which is the problem.
Who even has a top 4 RHD available? Tyler Myers? Is he even better than Parayko? We can't just throw a bunch of assets at a random team and tell them "gimme your top RHD right now".I would never advocate that the team would be better by simply losing Parayko for nothing. He’s a good player, just not worth $6.5M for the next 8 years. What I’m advocating for is better d-men in place of Parayko and Krug. Or at least upgrading one of them.
That of course, is much easier said than done, which is the problem.
When I look at what happened in the rest of the Western Conference, I think the Blues are in better position going into the season than they were going into last season. No team that was a conference contender got better, unless you want to argue Vegas...but they look like a flawed team to me.This forum is hard to read sometimes. Everyone continues to expect an improved roster during every off-season, but you have to play chess in a cap world and there will certainly be moments you lose key pieces. It's inevitable and part of the game, really. However, sometimes losing less pieces than your opponents is the key to gaining a relative advantage, and the fact that most fans cannot see this reality is getting annoying at this point.
Also, people continue to gripe about the defense. It's a top 6-10 defense. Couple that with a top 5 offense and a clutch goaltender with an ability to play the puck and we might have Colorado's kryptonite as long as Kadri signs elsewhere.
yup, agree again. problem is.. who's the better dman coming back, and what does he cost?I would never advocate that the team would be better by simply losing Parayko for nothing. He’s a good player, just not worth $6.5M for the next 8 years. What I’m advocating for is better d-men in place of Parayko and Krug. Or at least upgrading one of them.
That of course, is much easier said than done, which is the problem.
think it's more of the 'opportunity' to get a highly skilled PF in his prime, which is extremely rare. Winger or no, those don't hit the market very often. Great hands, physical, 200' game, decent skater (ie, not a plodder. see: Maroon, Pat)I love how people are on the same page about our defense needing improved but some are still advocating paying up for MT. Whatever assets the blues have comparable to that FLA package would have been a complete waste in a trade for a winger. I don’t care who that winger is. Whatever “currency” (please slap me for using that term) the blues have to spend should not be wasted at Forward unless there is some young stud center available that I’m unaware about.