Perron dove, who cares. Blues still won the game and he's one of our best offensive forwards with loads of potential.
Finally another voice of reason on the subject.
Seeing some of the posts on here would make you think that Perron only has like 3 or 4 goals this year. Wait. That's someone else. "But he dove." Who gives a damn. "But that's not Blues hockey" Well, Blues hockey has won a grand total of 0 Stanley Cups which isn't surprising if the prevailing attitude in town is "screw talented players like Perron. Give us Chris Porter."
So much fail from this fanbase.
No matter how much you love Perron, you have to agree that he had a rough 2 periods last night. Very rough. The third was much better. His line had a couple of excellent shifts, and he was a big part of that.
Finally another voice of reason on the subject.
Seeing some of the posts on here would make you think that Perron only has like 3 or 4 goals this year. Wait. That's someone else. "But he dove." Who gives a damn. "But that's not Blues hockey" Well, Blues hockey has won a grand total of 0 Stanley Cups which isn't surprising if the prevailing attitude in town is "screw talented players like Perron. Give us Chris Porter."
So much fail from this fanbase.
Finally another voice of reason on the subject.
Seeing some of the posts on here would make you think that Perron only has like 3 or 4 goals this year. Wait. That's someone else. "But he dove." Who gives a damn. "But that's not Blues hockey" Well, Blues hockey has won a grand total of 0 Stanley Cups which isn't surprising if the prevailing attitude in town is "screw talented players like Perron. Give us Chris Porter."
So much fail from this fanbase.
He had two very bad periods, and the minor penalties continue to be a major problem. Again, I don't think that he's doing much differently. I think that after a few years in the league, the refs are on to his "act" and don't give him the benefit of the doubt due to his reputation (which the Ric Flair dive didn't help). In other words, refs are ignoring the plays that he used to draw penalties on and watching him closer for stick infractions and subtle little things he got away with for a while
He, Tarasenko, and Sobotka make a ton of sense as a line and they can definitely be a force. If they do work well together, it would say a lot about Perron as he has moved lines a few times already this year and been able to generate offense wherever he has played.
Perron played pathetically last night. Doesn't matter if he's got all the talent in the world, doesn't help him one bit when he's in the box.
That dive. One facepalm isn't good enough.
I had the impression the ref had it out for Perron last night. It was a bad game for him, but mostly because of the penalties.
I recall reading something about the league approving a "divers" list for the refs, and I wondered whether Perron would be on it if there were such a thing. Maybe unofficially he already is. Anyway, there are times when Perron reminds me too much of the bad part of Burrows. At least I doubt he'd ever bite a guy's finger.
Wasn't it in Calgary last season when Perron spent the day at a sporting goods store shooting pucks in a simulator, and the guy at the store had no idea he was an NHL player? Then he scored a couple in the game? I hope he visits that place again, because a nice bounce-back game is in order.
Finally another voice of reason on the subject.
Seeing some of the posts on here would make you think that Perron only has like 3 or 4 goals this year. Wait. That's someone else. "But he dove." Who gives a damn. "But that's not Blues hockey" Well, Blues hockey has won a grand total of 0 Stanley Cups which isn't surprising if the prevailing attitude in town is "screw talented players like Perron. Give us Chris Porter."
So much fail from this fanbase.
Ottawa, actually. But yeah hopefully he bounces back tonight, been really frustrated with him pretty much all year.
Perron on the 3rd line makes sense to you? I hope Perron working his ass off to get back into the top 6. Hitch isn't moving him to help other lines, he's bumping him because he's not performing well all-around night in and night out.
Why does every years team have to have a whipping boy?
Why does every years team have to have a whipping boy?
Because Adam Creighton isn't eligible anymore
He's out there with a RW with similar offensive instincts and creativity and Sobotka who has been better offensively this season than David Backes and more consistent with his effort than Berglund. That's one hell of a punishment right there. If he was with Reaves and Nichol, you may have a point. It's funny that you have said that I have "proven to look at this fairly" a few posts down from where I acknowledge Perron had a rough 2 periods. Your problem seems to be that you are unwilling to accept that your position and the current groupthink on the board by the anti-Perron faction is lazy and inaccurate.
It's like people forget that typically following a streak where Perron plays like a dumbass and goes pointless comes a streak where he gets 7 points in 5 games. He has been here a while now. You should have figured this out by now.
He has this season.Now Sobotka has been better offensively than Backes?
Why does every years team have to have a whipping boy?