Half-Assed GDT: Blues @ Canucks 9PM CST on BSMW

Status
Not open for further replies.

jackjohnson

Registered User
Feb 9, 2021
8,093
5,331
why-waste-time-when-few-word-do-trick.gif

Who needs to out shoot an opponent when you score 3 on 13 shots
They have their 6th stringer. I think even I could score on him and I dont play hockey lol.
 

A Real Barn Burner

Registered User
Apr 25, 2016
2,579
3,160
Sure, but at it's best, the score would be 1-1 and at it's worst it's still 3-1. There are plenty of metrics we could take into account right now to tell the full story like high danger vs low danger chances, and we can take into account that Husso is wildly outperforming every other backup right now and is saving shots that should go in. No matter what way you put it, there ARE ways to quantify the game to describe what's going on. Let's not forget that the Blues outshot the Kings plenty of times but never took control of their games when they faced them in the playoffs.

We never had an answer to Quick and the Kings always got timely goals when they needed them. You could say it was luck but they did it to everyone.
 

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
78,747
33,616
Yeah, when you're facing their 3rd string goalie!
It’s actually our fifth:laugh:
Just wanted to say that because I thought it was a funny response lol

How are the blues even doing this year? really liking your goalie tonight
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoMoBlues

A Real Barn Burner

Registered User
Apr 25, 2016
2,579
3,160
Arguably Vancouver's three main offensive playdrivers in Miller, Garland, and Horvat are out too. The usual 4th line is currently the 2nd line. Pretty decimated roster all around.

For a decimated roster they are putting up a good fight! Husso is the first star for me so far tonight.

Nucks always play us well for whatever reason.
 

jackjohnson

Registered User
Feb 9, 2021
8,093
5,331
i dont buy the covid excuses. we played our 5th string goalie and made the ducks take us to OT before we lost on a penalty shot.

the canucks are simply not a very good team.

blues are playing their C game and up 3-1
Canucks dont have their top 2 faceoff guys and top 2 centers which is huge in Miller and Horvat. They dont have Garland who is a top 6 winger and 3rd in points. They are also missing their MVP in Demko and their backup in Halak and their backup backup in Martins and Silovs. They are playing their 6th stringer and if he gets injured, a university goalie will replace him. They also are missing Hamonic who is their top 4D. Its an automatic loss for Canucks. If Canucks were to beat the Blues, then that would be a huge upset IMO.
 

A Real Barn Burner

Registered User
Apr 25, 2016
2,579
3,160
It’s actually our fifth:laugh:
Just wanted to say that because I thought it was a funny response lol

How are the blues even doing this year? really liking your goalie tonight

Blues fans are getting used to an offensive oriented team. We haven’t had this level of depth and talent for scoring since the 90s maybe the late 80’s imho! Great expectation are tempered by defensive deficiency .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canucks LB

ezcreepin

Registered User
Dec 5, 2016
2,711
2,476
We never had an answer to Quick and the Kings always got timely goals when they needed them. You could say it was luck but they did it to everyone.
I have to reject that, Blues' shot selection was atrocious against Quick, but they generally kept the Blues shots from far away. Kings would generally score much closer, but they also got inside the Blues' heads. Could've been a mix of the Kings playing better and the Blues beating themselves up mentally
 

BlueDream

Registered User
Aug 30, 2011
26,200
15,086
PP looks awful.

All around shit performance, lucky to win. So they better win tomorrow too.
 

BlueMed

Registered User
Jul 18, 2019
2,912
3,495
Sure, but at it's best, the score would be 1-1 and at it's worst it's still 3-1. There are plenty of metrics we could take into account right now to tell the full story like high danger vs low danger chances, and we can take into account that Husso is wildly outperforming every other backup right now and is saving shots that should go in. No matter what way you put it, there ARE ways to quantify the game to describe what's going on. Let's not forget that the Blues outshot the Kings plenty of times but never took control of their games when they faced them in the playoffs.

You literally just described what I already stated. Number of shots doesn't necessarily account for shot quality or location. Isolated statistics in this game mean nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Real Barn Burner

BlueMed

Registered User
Jul 18, 2019
2,912
3,495
I remember when people were comparing Thomas to Bo Horvat. Funny how Thomas is on another level now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mk80

TheDizee

Trade Jordan Kyrou ASAP | ALWAYS RIGHT
Apr 5, 2014
20,445
13,070
Canucks dont have their top 2 faceoff guys and top 2 centers which is huge in Miller and Horvat. They dont have Garland who is a top 6 winger and 3rd in points. They are also missing their MVP in Demko and their backup in Halak and their backup backup in Martins and Silovs. They are playing their 6th stringer and if he gets injured, a university goalie will replace him. They also are missing Hamonic who is their top 4D. Its an automatic loss for Canucks. If Canucks were to beat the Blues, then that would be a huge upset IMO.
yeah and?

we were beating teams with 10+ people out
 

A Real Barn Burner

Registered User
Apr 25, 2016
2,579
3,160
I have to reject that, Blues' shot selection was atrocious against Quick, but they generally kept the Blues shots from far away. Kings would generally score much closer, but they also got inside the Blues' heads. Could've been a mix of the Kings playing better and the Blues beating themselves up mentally

I would agree overall with what your saying. However, in defense i would like to point out that the reason we were boxed out and shutdown form the slot was we didn’t have the talent to open up the ice (Also had a coach who didn’t play that system). I think we average under 3 goals a game during Hitch tenure at that time. We changed that later with the STL line but at the time our best line was the SOB line. Counting on secondary scoring from Berglund or Stewart. That’s what I mean by didn’t have an answer for Quick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad