JetsUK
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2015
- 6,763
- 15,797
That's just not how the NHL does reviews. I'm aware of how camera angles work, but thanks for the rundown. The NHL has to see conclusive evidence that the puck is across the line. You cannot logically infer or cite the parallax effect to overturn a call. It also is not a foregone conclusion that the puck is surely in from that angle because of parallax. That's just an assumption. The angle on the overhead view is marginally offset, it's not reasonable to just assume it would be enough of a difference for the puck to be completely across.
This particular technical debate in the wake of last night’s shellacking might find a more receptive audience on the mains rather than HFJets…
Brutal game but this team has out-resilience’d previous Jets lineups all season long. Let’s see it again in Game 4, ideally with a healthier lineup.