Proposal: Blockbuster trade Habs & Nashville

Status
Not open for further replies.

malcb33

Registered User
Apr 10, 2005
1,247
1,260
New Zealand
There's a massive variable in this proposed trade that greatly affects the value, which is the cost of each of those long-term deals.

For example, Forsberg at 5M long-term, compared to 10M has a huge swing in value. Without knowing that, how can you say this is fair or not?
 

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,213
5,667
Dartmouth, NS
I think Montreal is good with Toffoli and Romanov, and that's not to say the pieces from Nashville aren't really good. If they're going to inflate their cap it needs to be for up the middle of the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lolonegoal

Porter Stoutheart

Seen Stamkos?
Jun 14, 2017
16,058
12,497
If Forsberg and Ekholm are signed long term, then it'd be in Nashville. But I wouldn't give them up just as rentals for that package either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TML1990

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
46,438
44,946
Caverns of Draconis
Value is not great, but also never going to happen because there's zero chance both Forsberg AND Ekholm would skip being a free agent to sign contracts with Montreal.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,366
36,594
This only works if those players don't want to sign long-term in Nashville.

That said, Toffoli has good value, but if Nashville is rebuilding he doesn't carry that much.
 

Jannik Hansen

Registered User
Apr 16, 2016
809
1,467
You want a strong top six winger and top four d-man locked up with term but won't even leave the pick unprotected? Come on man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: powerstuck

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
Dear Montreal fans,
Please stop including Joel Armia in your fantasy proposals. He has no value. The only pieces the Habs have with any trade value are draft picks, Romanov, Gallagher, Suzuki, and Caulfield.
Signed,
The rest of us.

Edit - I did forget Toffoli, I thought he had an NTC.
armia has no trade value .? you sir know absolutely nothing about the game of hockey . nothing , zilch, zero. nada,. one absolutely clueless statement
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
just what montreal would want to do . ekholm based on the recent defenseman signings would demand 7-8 million on a new deal . since he is past his prime we would be paying for his past and not the future . forsberg would be a nice piece but he'll be looking for 8-9 million to . someone should close this and montreal will keep their younger cheaper pieces .
 

Bringer of Jollity

Registered User
Oct 20, 2011
13,742
9,173
Fontana, CA
6a0120a6dde087970b0162fe356c86970d-pi


Montreal Typical [trade proposal]!

Awful for the Preds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Armourboy

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
If Ekholm or Forsberg re-signed = Romanov and a 1st then Montreal's getting the other for Toffoli and Armia. No thanks for Nashville.
ekholm no longer equals romanov and a first . a team like nashville that is beginning a rebuild would like that but it's not happening. anyone who thinks it is should give there head a shake . especially when you consider future salary
 

MTL Dirty Birdy

Registered User
Aug 29, 2021
1,357
1,547
Habs : Romanov + Toffoli + first pick 2023 (top 10 protected) + Joel Armia
For
Nashville : Forsberg (signed long terms) + Ekholm (signed long terms)
Good effort on the value. I think it could be fair. On Habs perspective IMO they pass. I do t feel it’s that big of an upgrade to move all that out dude. Just my opinion✌️
 

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,721
5,770
Visit site
So we give up on a highly regarded young player like Romanov to pay top dollar to a 31 year old Ekholm. It's not like the rest of the top 6 defenseman are not over 30.

Ummm......lemme think....NOOOOOOOO
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoneyManny

Bruce Granville

Registered User
Oct 11, 2014
5,906
4,618
armia has no trade value .? you sir know absolutely nothing about the game of hockey . nothing , zilch, zero. nada,. one absolutely clueless statement
Armia was an UFA and nobody wanted to sign him.
So, yes, his value is quite low. Not negative, but obviously not enough to be added in every trade proposal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad