Value of: Blackwood to the Leafs

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,684
4,635
Pacific Northwest
Rebound from what? Eakins?

He was a top goalie to start season and faded when Anaheim hit Covid and was starting an ahl roster most nights, then we traded away our top dmen.
You keep saying this in every thread on these boards while trying to sell Gibson. By what metrics are you basing it on?

Through the first three months of the season, Gibson was 11-8 with a .915% save percentage.

John Gibson's stats over the first three months were not even top ten in the league.
 

Sweetpotato

Registered User
Jan 10, 2014
6,828
4,025
Edmonton
Move Mrazek and take a run at both Samsonov and Blackwood and hope one of them hits their potential as a tandem. A lot of cap savings you can use on shoring up the D group.
 

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,741
17,485
San Diego
It'd be contingent on us adding a new starting goalie through trade or free agency. But I thought Blackwood could be a fit with Toronto and the Devils could hypothetically eat some of the cap hit so Blackwood might be closer to Campbell's 1.65 mil cap hit from this season.

That said, getting another goalie to replace Blackwood isn't a trivial thing and I wouldn't want Mrazek. And we might be kinda stuck with Bernier who should get medically cleared but there's always worries that his hip could act up again.
 

Setec Astronomy

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
2,626
1,786
It'd be contingent on us adding a new starting goalie through trade or free agency. But I thought Blackwood could be a fit with Toronto and the Devils could hypothetically eat some of the cap hit so Blackwood might be closer to Campbell's 1.65 mil cap hit from this season.

That said, getting another goalie to replace Blackwood isn't a trivial thing and I wouldn't want Mrazek. And we might be kinda stuck with Bernier who should get medically cleared but there's always worries that his hip could act up again.

Unless the Devils add a $10 million contract, they could either buy him out or send him to the AHL if there were another goalie they wanted to add and keep Blackwood.
 

HugeInTheShire

You may not like me but, I'm Huge in the Shire
Mar 8, 2021
4,418
5,836
Alberta
As my fellow Devil fans have pointed out if they move Blackwood, they'll need an adequate replacement.

As for my opinion I could see them moving away from Blackwood but they shouldn't be looking for picks and prospects for him unless the prospect is NHL ready.

If they can find a suitable replacement for him in free agency or via trade, they should be looking for a younger NHL ready RHD or a winger with size.
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
16,063
14,830
I think he just needs to get out of NJ, it just seems like it's time for them to split
Yeah. I just think he needs the right situation to get his mojo back. Similar to Georgiev actually. Talented guys but probably lacking confidence right now.
 

franste Perreault

Registered User
Dec 2, 2021
279
97
They don't need another goalie with no NHL playoff experience.
If they want a goalie they need to look a guy like Fleury, Gibson, Grubauer etc ...
 

Unbiased Fan

Registered User
May 24, 2019
3,803
1,803
Mrazek, Holl+ actual value for Blackwood

Maybe a 1st?

I don’t see Blackwood being worth more then a 2nd and I don’t see Mrazek costing much to dump personally. I don’t think Holl holds much value but he fits in on New Jersey pretty much no value but absolutely not negative value. Lots of teams could use a RHD.

Yeah. I just think he needs the right situation to get his mojo back. Similar to Georgiev actually. Talented guys but probably lacking confidence right now.
Personally if the assets are cheap and Mrazek can be dumped for something reasonable then I’d feel content with Georgiev and Blackwood as a tandem BUT I doubt management would go for the lack of experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,408
16,043
Mrazek, Holl+ actual value for Blackwood

Maybe a 1st?

I don’t see Blackwood being worth more then a 2nd and I don’t see Mrazek costing much to dump personally. I don’t think Holl holds much value but he fits in on New Jersey pretty much no value but absolutely not negative value. Lots of teams could use a RHD.


Personally if the assets are cheap and Mrazek can be dumped for something reasonable then I’d feel content with Georgiev and Blackwood as a tandem BUT I doubt management would go for the lack of experience.

yet you suggest a 1st
 

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,777
20,878
Yeah. I just think he needs the right situation to get his mojo back. Similar to Georgiev actually. Talented guys but probably lacking confidence right now.

Both of them scream good backups/spot starters but I can't see them being good starters. Too inconsistent as players.
 

Tufted Titmouse

13 Cups.
Apr 5, 2022
6,222
8,322
I don't think I'd give up a 1st to dump Mrazek, but my fair GM sure has shown a willingness to so who knows.

If that's the cost, I think I just run with him and hopes he can play like he did in his stint right before his recent injury.

I think we could get a 2nd for Kerfoot, so maybe I would consider using that pick to help move out Mrazek's money. Not expecting other fanbases to take the same leap of faith I'm willing to take.

No idea what Holl's value is. Somewhere around a late 2nd or 3rd I am guessing. Bottom pairing RD on a good D core. Filler player with no real potential imo, but still and NHL guy with length.
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,408
16,043
We’re also dumping Mrazek here

I get that but you said you don't think Marazek would cost to much to dump, a 1st is A LOT to dump Marazek.

now if it was a Gibson trade where say Robertson, Marazek and a 1st wewnt the other way and that is a suggestion by ducks fans, not my suggestion.

That would be one thing

But Blackwood isn't there yet, I think he can get there but he's not there yet
 

Unbiased Fan

Registered User
May 24, 2019
3,803
1,803
I get that but you said you don't think Marazek would cost to much to dump, a 1st is A LOT to dump Marazek.

now if it was a Gibson trade where say Robertson, Marazek and a 1st wewnt the other way and that is a suggestion by ducks fans, not my suggestion.

That would be one thing

But Blackwood isn't there yet, I think he can get there but he's not there yet
You’re paying a 1st to dump Mrazek and get Blackwood.
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
16,063
14,830
Both of them scream good backups/spot starters but I can't see them being good starters. Too inconsistent as players.
I agree neither are right to helm a contending team like the Leafs. The Leafs need a legit number one with a track record. A guy like Blackwood would be a good backup in that case though.
Georgiev is another story. Very talented but also sensitive. I’d love a team to give him a real shot to win a starter’s job. But a building team would make more sense for him I think. A situation that can nurture him better than the rangers can/have.
 

BlueBaron

Registered User
May 29, 2006
15,752
6,350
Sarnia, On
Heh, this is an idea that is becoming more interesting with Campbell's future with us in doubt. Problem is this is very scout specific. I can't imagine what our guys think of him or where they rate him but his age checks a big box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,777
20,878
I agree neither are right to helm a contending team like the Leafs. The Leafs need a legit number one with a track record. A guy like Blackwood would be a good backup in that case though.
Georgiev is another story. Very talented but also sensitive. I’d love a team to give him a real shot to win a starter’s job. But a building team would make more sense for him I think. A situation that can nurture him better than the rangers can/have.

If the Devils-Rangers weren't such massive rivals, there'd probably be a deal there. Devils going into next year with a UFA goalie + Georgiev could've been their plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PainForShane

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,132
Calgary Alberta
And that’s why your not paying a ton for gibson, a late 1st…. And a prospect and you get to drop mrazek.
Yes I agree that’s probably the way to go but I’d still be worried about if Gibson can be Gibson from 3-4 years ago.
He should go for a late first plus a prospect but Ducks fans asking price is insane.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,546
39,384
Yes I agree that’s probably the way to go but I’d still be worried about if Gibson can be Gibson from 3-4 years ago.
He should go for a late first plus a prospect but Ducks fans asking price is insane.
A lot of duck fans think 1st + prospect…. Some neutral fans say high cost, and obviously you have a few duck fans expecting gibson to get what he woulda got if he was traded 3 years ago.

I think most of us would be going for a 1st + god prospect, and we take back cap to help facilitate

Oilers
1st + Holloway/boulguarts + kassian
Leafs
1st + knies/robertson + mrazek

Is around what I see is getting, knies/Holloway prob unlikely but I think that would be our initial ask. I assume devils, Sabres, and possibly pitt would have interest also
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
16,063
14,830
A lot of duck fans think 1st + prospect…. Some neutral fans say high cost, and obviously you have a few duck fans expecting gibson to get what he woulda got if he was traded 3 years ago.

I think most of us would be going for a 1st + god prospect, and we take back cap to help facilitate

Oilers
1st + Holloway/boulguarts + kassian
Leafs
1st + knies/robertson + mrazek

Is around what I see is getting, knies/Holloway prob unlikely but I think that would be our initial ask. I assume devils, Sabres, and possibly pitt would have interest also
Leafs should do that if it’s offered.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad