Sasha Orlov
Lord of the Manor
- Jun 22, 2018
- 9,726
- 23,041
2010 Olympics, 2014 Olympics, 2016 World CupThere's only been 2 since then.
2010 Olympics, 2014 Olympics, 2016 World CupThere's only been 2 since then.
2016 wasn't best on best.2010 Olympics, 2014 Olympics, 2016 World Cup
2010 Olympics, 2014 Olympics, 2016 World Cup
Literally has nothing to do with my point or the other posters point idk why you even responded to me2016 wasn't best on best.
We didn't just beat everyone else, we also beat the other Team Canada!
As well as the entire country of Europe.
View attachment 976666
Whats stupid is invalidating an entire tournament because one team with a terrible track record isn't included.When’s the last time Canada lost best on best? 2006 Olympics? Why even have tournaments? Stupid
Lmao nice pivotWhats stupid is invalidating an entire tournament because one team with a terrible track record isn't included.
Have no idea what you're referring to. That was my point all along. If you struggle with reading comprehension there are plenty of places and programs that can help you. If you wish to engage in the actual topic at hand, the ball is in your court. Otherwise, good day to you.Lmao nice pivot
Sad
Well, with including European bidding cities and opening it up to 8 teams, those are good steps.
Also confirmed that it will rotate with the Olympics so one tournament every two years.
No, you said it doesn’t matter because they haven’t won recentlyHave no idea what you're referring to. That was my point all along. If you struggle with reading comprehension there are plenty of places and programs that can help you. If you wish to engage in the actual topic at hand, the ball is in your court. Otherwise, good day to you.
That's up to them.Give me some Russia!!!
There's a reason, you know.It’s not best on best without Russia
Nobody is worried about Russia winning. Anything.No, you said it doesn’t matter because they haven’t won recently
Nobody has won but Canada in two decades
Using your dumb logic there’s no reason to play at all lmfao
In reality you’re just afraid that Russia will win but it’s ok
Russia you say? I have some news to you.They should include Russia and Czechia as locks. Then hold a small tournament in Europe as a "qualifier" to find the final 2 teams.
Nice job Bettman. So instead of participating in the Olympics, the greatest global sports platform ever conceived and the best way to grow the sport, you will have yet another event that nobody but people who already watch hockey are going to watch. I dont know why they didnt fire this dumb asshole 10 years ago.
There's a reason, you know.
The real question is whether the World Championships are hosted in those years.
I'm sure the IIHF will want to do so, but you might see less star power in those years if guys are already going to the World Cup / Olympics.
Obviously you will still have guys who miss the NHL playoffs, but some of the marquee names from those eliminated teams likely won't want to do two tournaments.
Nah, at least for the time being, the "real question" is whether a World Cup happens in 2028.I get the point you're making, but I don't think the IIHF can/should plan their own schedule and tournaments around if the league & PA feel like/are capable of organizing a World Cup in a given year.
I think a 2028 World Cup is 50/50 at best... Or the "at least 8 teams, with games spanning two continents" version of it is. Wouldn't be shocked if it just ends up being another 4-Nations type deal. I mean the 4-Nations thing came about because the league/PA was unable to pull off organizing a WC.
I don’t disagree.
Their track record is not very good.
Russia is banned in almost everything...