-
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Better timeframe for hockey, 2010-2011 to 2015-16 or 1998-99 to 2003-04
- Thread starter Felidae
- Start date
Golden_Jet
Registered User
I’d say either an earlier or later timeframe, than those listed.
Wings4Life
Registered User
I voted for the 2010s. The game had evolved by leaps and bounds after the lockout.
The late 90s had bottom 6 guys who would be AHL replacement level players today, or worse.
The late 90s had bottom 6 guys who would be AHL replacement level players today, or worse.
Duffy13
(ﾉಥ益ಥ）ﾉ ┻━┻
Look at every 4th line out there today and you will find lots of those types still in the game, hell, Pittsburgh may have 2 or 3 alone lol
Video Nasty
Registered User
Despite scoring dwindling each season, easily 1998-1999 to 2003-2004.
Better rivalries, better playoff seeding, more interesting top end talent, better goalies who seemed more consistent, no shootout. Mario’s comeback at the end of 2000 probably generated more excitement in me than anything up to McDavid’s debut.
It’s not a nostalgia vote for me since I think the period we’re currently in right now is the best since the early 90s.
Better rivalries, better playoff seeding, more interesting top end talent, better goalies who seemed more consistent, no shootout. Mario’s comeback at the end of 2000 probably generated more excitement in me than anything up to McDavid’s debut.
It’s not a nostalgia vote for me since I think the period we’re currently in right now is the best since the early 90s.
I Hate Blake Coleman
Bandwagon Burner
Earlier era had more entertaining teams and stars.
