Better defensive player? Crosby or McDavid | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Better defensive player? Crosby or McDavid

Who is the better defensive player? Crosby or McDavid

  • Crosby

    Votes: 55 90.2%
  • McDavid

    Votes: 6 9.8%

  • Total voters
    61
  • This poll will close: .
Honestly, the distinction isn't meaningful.

They're both great offensive superstars and splitting hairs over who is better defensively in his own zone is really reaching.

Both guys are great at controlling play in their own way and because of that, each generally "tilts the ice" and outscores the opposition, which is what you expect and want from franchise-level players.

Both can be decent to good in terms of pure defensive zone defense, but it's neither guy's forte. We're not comparing Fedorov to Patrick Kane here.

Between the two of them, they have one top five Selke voting finish (Crosby finished fourth in 2019).

Selke voting and reputation suggest Crosby is a notch better, but neither is a Kopitar or Barkov... it doesn't really matter.
 
Honestly, the distinction isn't meaningful.

They're both great offensive superstars and splitting hairs over who is better defensively in his own zone is really reaching.

Both guys are great at controlling play in their own way and because of that, each generally "tilts the ice" and outscores the opposition, which is what you expect and want from franchise-level players.

Both can be decent to good in terms of pure defensive zone defense, but it's neither guy's forte. We're not comparing Fedorov to Patrick Kane here.

Between the two of them, they have one top five Selke voting finish (Crosby finished fourth in 2019).

Selke voting and reputation suggest Crosby is a notch better, but neither is a Kopitar or Barkov... it doesn't really matter.
It's not just pure defensive ability. Crosby is able to grind players down along the boards and win battles in all zones, whereas McDavid is more free flowing and dancing around players.

They both have their strengths and weaknesses but imo Crosby is more well rounded/era proof, whereas McDavid is more naturally skilled/talented.
 
It would be massive revisionist history to put McDavid ahead of Crosby. Also people discount the value of a forecheck and playing deep in the corners as being part of a good defensive forward. Crosby simply is better at that. (EDIT: person above me made this exact point but posted while I was typing).

Before Oilers fans get mad, McDavid is the more skilled player and is better at a LOT of things but this isnt one of em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast
Not sure how this will be close:

Crosby Selke finishes: 4, 7, 9, 9, 10 12, 14, 15, 18, 19

McDavid Selke finishes: 16, 26, 27, 30

Finishes like 12th and 14th don't mean that much. I think most of Crosby's higher finishes are from his late 20s to early 30s (the point of his career McDavid is reaching now).

Neither guy has won the award or come particularly close to doing so. I think to be considered a legit two-way guy among superstar or franchise level players, you need to actually have won the award or at least finished top five in voting a handful of times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: COHawk
This isn't even a discussion really :laugh:

tumblr_m8z1wwyA8v1ql0k28o1_1280.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: geebster
Finishes like 12th and 14th don't mean that much. I think most of Crosby's higher finishes are from his late 20s to early 30s (the point of his career McDavid is reaching now).

Neither guy has won the award or come particularly close to doing so. I think to be considered a legit two-way guy among superstar or franchise level players, you need to actually have won the award or at least finished top five in voting a handful of times.
While I agree, Crosby did have 4 top 20 finishes (and 1 top 10) by his age 28 season. But you are correct his 3 other top 10 finishes came from ages 30-36.

But the poll is who is the better defensive player, not who was better during the first 10 years of their career.
 
Is this a joke thread?

Most likely. There's another thread going on where some random McDavid-stan has started repeatedly and unironically arguing (among other things) that McDavid is a better 2-way forward than Barkov because McDavid's had a better xGF% and GF% in the playoffs the last 3 years.

So yeah, probably a joke thread (or at least a joke poll), but maybe appropriate, at least depending who you ask and maybe also on your point of view and the role of threads and / or polls in general
 
Crosby is more adaptable and versatile. McDavid can probably do more in anticipation scenarios though, and you aren't allowed to do much more than that nowadays anyway lol
 
Finishes like 12th and 14th don't mean that much. I think most of Crosby's higher finishes are from his late 20s to early 30s (the point of his career McDavid is reaching now).

Neither guy has won the award or come particularly close to doing so. I think to be considered a legit two-way guy among superstar or franchise level players, you need to actually have won the award or at least finished top five in voting a handful of times.
Crosby did come quite close to winning in 2019.

And this is just a weird comment, implying that unless a guy is a Selke winner there's no significant difference between players defensively.
 
Sid was just voted the most complete player by his union brothers for the sixth year in a row, so I'd say this is easily The Kid. And by The Kid I mean the elder of the two.

McDavid has many, many strengths and the ability to break the puck out of the defensive zone basically on his own is huge. But Sid just has that preternatural anticipation and instinct to be exactly where the puck is going to be and developed into a great two way center during his mid 20s
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm
Crosby is overrated as hell defensively. In the latter half of his career, he’s been about average to very slightly above average defensively. Neither are defensive forwards, or particularly good defensively, and the difference between them in this regard is insignificant. But for some reason, Crosby has this reputation of being strong defensively. He isn’t.

This is like asking which car is more powerful, a Honda Civic or a Toyota Corolla? The answer is who tf cares.
 
Crosby is overrated as hell defensively. In the latter half of his career, he’s been about average to very slightly above average defensively. Neither are defensive forwards, or particularly good defensively, and the difference between them in this regard is insignificant. But for some reason, Crosby has this reputation of being strong defensively. He isn’t.

This is like asking which car is more powerful, a Honda Civic or a Toyota Corolla? The answer is who tf cares.
Is there some sort of McDavid cult where his fans are unable to admit he's worse in any aspect?

It's a yes or no, and I'm sure if you thought McDavid was better you would care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geebster
Finishes like 12th and 14th don't mean that much. I think most of Crosby's higher finishes are from his late 20s to early 30s (the point of his career McDavid is reaching now).

Neither guy has won the award or come particularly close to doing so. I think to be considered a legit two-way guy among superstar or franchise level players, you need to actually have won the award or at least finished top five in voting a handful of times.
That's a really arbitrary bar. If one had zero top 15 finishes and the other has 8 (5 in the top 10) thars a meaningful difference. The thread isnt who is an actual defensive forward or shutdown guy, but simply who is better. By saying that you need more than one top 5 or winning the award you completely ignore the argument.

Are you saying that they are identical, since neither meet that arbitrary bar? Are you saying that finishing 4th is the same as getting 0 votes?

Crosby is better defensively. He isnt Barkov or Datsyuk and hes probably overrated at it, but hes still better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bambamcam4ever

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad