GrumpyKoala
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2020
- 3,339
- 3,585
didn't realize that Ranford's numbers at that time were that bad, wow. Or at least his 96-97 numbers.And Byron Dafoe wasn’t shabby leading into Raycroft.
Let’s not talk about the period between Andy Moog and Dafoe, tho…
STONKSRaycroft, Gustavsson, Toskala, Bernier=GOATed
The Habs from like 1910 until 1933 went from Vezina to Hainsworth, then a bit of a gap for like four years, and then Bill Durnan until 1950, and then like 2 years until Jacques Plante through 63. Then another five years and you have Vachon and then Dryden.
Habs goaltending from a historical perspective is f***ing absurd. They've had a HHOFer in net more often than not, and not by a little bit either. Like 80% of the time they had a top 15 goalie of all time in net it seems like.
Put more on the goalie coach. Melanson and Clark over the years.STONKS
How about Edmonton!
Clapped out Khabibulin, clapped out Bryzgalov, Dubnyk, Scrivens, Fasth, Talbot, Koskinen, Campbell!
Damn that’s even shittier than I thought when I started typing lmao.
Canucks have some seriously good goalie scouting processes!
2 decades of amazing goaltending then fall on hard times for a decade. Doesn’t always last. NJ enduring that too now.Buffalo basically had Hasek and Miller from 1992 to 2014 (with a sprinkling of Biron during the transition)
Any goalie can have one good season. Rangers okay the long game with Lundqvist -> ShesterkinExcept he does.
He played 1 season as the starter, posted a .926 (5th in the NHL) and 2.05 (6th in the NHL), won the Calder and finished 5th in Vezina voting. The next season is when Thomas took over, and Raycroft managed to get you Tuukka Rask in the trade market
Definitely an underrated stretch, Miller was top tier for quite awhile there.Buffalo basically had Hasek and Miller from 1992 to 2014 (with a sprinkling of Biron during the transition)
I came here to say this. I think it's important to consider teams like the Rangers had top of their field goaltenders, not just a collection of top goalies.Richter, Lundqvist, Shesterkin with appearances by Blackburn (career cut short but promising), Dunham, Valiquette, Weekes and Van Biesbrouck? Pretty solid.
For most of the last 35 years, the Rangers have had Richter, Lundqvist and Shesterkin.
Yeah in recent memory it's probably Boston.
MTL had an incredible stretchfrom the 70s to 2010s: Dryden, (filler years), Roy, (a few filler years), Theodore, Price. That's 4 vezina winners, 2 hart winners and 2 conn smythe winners
Nashville also had a pretty good stretch during the 2000s: Vokoun to Rinne to Saros.
Come on Raycroft doesn’t count.![]()
You forgot the best one of the group, QuickFor most of the last 35 years, the Rangers have had Richter, Lundqvist and Shesterkin.
That last part is not the flex you think it is lmaoWashington low key had a good string of goaltending. Carey won the Vezina as a rookie, lost the job to Kolzig who held onto it for a decade. Then Theodore had a brief stint before Varlamov & Neuvirth took over and then Holtby came in at the end. All these guys except Theodore were drafted and developed by the Capitals too, even Samsonov and Vanecek, while mediocre starters, came up through their system.
Cam Talbot was also a good backup for Lundqvist. Especially during that Cup run. You always felt confident when he started games in place of Henrik.Don't know if the best, but... Vanbiesbrouck- Richter- Lundqvist- Shesterkin, with some "transition" seasons of Dunham and Giorgiev as goalies, is more than most of the teams can dream.