Best player in the world: 2010

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Best player in the world: 2010

  • H. Sedin

    Votes: 15 8.2%
  • Crosby

    Votes: 54 29.5%
  • Ovechkin

    Votes: 102 55.7%
  • Stamkos

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • Backstrom

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kane

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Gaborik

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Kovalchuk

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Malkin

    Votes: 6 3.3%
  • Datsyuk

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Keith

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lidstrom

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pronger

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Miller

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Lundqvist

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    183
  • Poll closed .
The difference between Ovechkin and his competitors in 08-09 and 09-10 was marginal, so yes a small number of cheap, easy, unskilled goals and points which padded his final totals and made his numbers look a little better than they actually were makes a difference. Notice how I didn't make note of that for 07-08? Thats because that season he indeed had less of those unskilled goals.
Sure, doesn’t mean he wasn’t the best player though. No matter how marginal the difference may be.

No, you’re just looking for reasons to “call him out” when in the end it’s bullshit. Like I said, 10 goals out of 106 isn’t something note worthy, but you’re forming an argument out of it because that’s all you have. It’s desperate and rather lazy. But feel free to post all the stats you want. Doesn’t change how ridiculous your view point is.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheStatican
Regular Season:
-> Ovechkin had essentially the exact same goals/points as Crosby, in 9 less games played. This is a very clear and decently large advantage for Ovechkin

Playoffs:
-> Crosby was 6 goals and 19 points in 13 games. Ovechkin was 5 goals and 10 points in 7 games. This is pretty much identical production, except Ovechkin was a significantly better goal scorer in the playoffs. Giving Crosby any advantage for playoffs is simply saying because his TEAM did better, Crosby was the better player (which is a terrible argument).

Olympics:
-> Both were a point per game, and both were about 0.5 goals/gp. Crosby also had a much more stacked team, and was in a 4-way tie for 2nd in points on his own team (with another 4 players that had 1 less point than him on his own team). Everyone on that team C team was producing points, and other than the golden goal, Crosby was not producing on any other kind of level that was much better than Ovechkin.

This is easily Ovechkin again.
Sounds objective......but that's what putting a square block in a round hole looks like.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad