BB88
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2015
- 41,492
- 21,881
I still think he’s going to Colorado
Why would he leave for a worse situation?
I still think he’s going to Colorado
Don't do it, Cats.
It’s going to be underwhelming if Zito locks all these guys in for 6+ years with NTCs and we only walk away with the one cup.
Signing Bennett is how the Cats shut their window shut. They have the pieces to absorb his loss. Him and Ekblad need to go once their contracts expire.
If Colorado wins it with Bennett, Bennett will probably go in the HOFWhy would he leave for a worse situation?
Yeah, what a damn shame.It’s going to be underwhelming if Zito locks all these guys in for 6+ years with NTCs and we only walk away with the one cup.
Yeah, what a damn shame.
It’s going to be underwhelming if Zito locks all these guys in for 6+ years with NTCs and we only walk away with the one cup.
Or, he realizes he’s on a strong contender and has played his best hockey since he’s been here, loved every second of it, and is willing to stay. He could move on, but kinda seems more like hope than an opinion.Just get the feeling Bennet is the level of player who will need to move on (as a UFA) to get the contract he deserves. He might stay with the Panthers but imo he signs with a new club July 1, 2025.
You know you are doing pretty well when your fans start forgetting what it was like before you had good players.We’ve earned the President’s Trophy, been to the Finals, and won the Cup the last 3 years and continue to be a top team in the NHL, I’m not sure what’s underwhelming. Sure, we’d all love to win multiple Cups and we’re all hoping for it, but that’s incredibly hard to do.
100% depends on Bennet if he chooses to leave a lot of money that will certainly be available on July 1 (AAV and term for total dollars) to take quite a bit less to stay with the Panthers. Bennet would be looking at 50 mil on the open market. The Panthers, with Barkov and Lundel in the C1 and C2 roles) will not come close to that. More likely they’re offering 5 x 5. There’s going to be a big gap.Or, he realizes he’s on a strong contender and has played his best hockey since he’s been here, loved every second of it, and is willing to stay. He could move on, but kinda seems more like hope than an opinion.
That's my point. We had a fantastic three seasons with this group. We did that while they were on mid-term deals. It worries me that we're setting the Top 6 in stone through their retirement.We’ve earned the President’s Trophy, been to the Finals, and won the Cup the last 3 years and continue to be a top team in the NHL, I’m not sure what’s underwhelming. Sure, we’d all love to win multiple Cups and we’re all hoping for it, but that’s incredibly hard to do.
Smart clubs move on from players who helped win but are getting older. Stamkos is the perfect example and he was right next door. Tampa used the money Stamkos wanted (and deserved) to bring in a player more suited to help the club win now and down the road. Stamkos left and got his money in Nashville. Tampa rolls on and so would the Panthers without Bennet.That's my point. We had a fantastic three seasons with this group. We did that while they were on mid-term deals. It worries me that we're setting the Top 6 in stone through their retirement.
But, it’s an elite top 6 that plays extremely well together and employs the system at high end level to that point that it got us our first Cup. IMO it’s incredibly wise to lock this group up and see how much damage they can do. The cap is going to continue to go up, Bob and Ek come off the books soon so that will free up more money for the D, I’m really not sure what the concern is.That's my point. We had a fantastic three seasons with this group. We did that while they were on mid-term deals. It worries me that we're setting the Top 6 in stone through their retirement.
Agreed. As a day 1 fan, tbh honest much bigger fan after 96, I love this group and the work both the owners and management has done to get us here. Zito won’t go over the number and term he knows will work with the cap, and he’s earned our trust with it.You know you are doing pretty well when your fans start forgetting what it was like before you had good players.
There are lots of fans that would be happy as heck for a single cup and a super competitive team for a decade. Some haven't seen either in decades.
If Bennett wants top dollar I doubt he is in Florida, but if he wants to continue to be on a good team and still make decent money he can do that.
Of course it’s 100% up to him, but Zito will bring all the positives I mentioned to him and he clearly wants to keep him here. Benny is current in the 2C spot and if Lundy wants it, he’ll have to nudge Bennett out. Right now, we have one of the top center groups in the league, which (as I’ve mentioned) is paying off with Barkov out for a long stretch. There’s no negatives to keep Bennett and him choosing to stay. Sure, less money, but how much less with no sales tax benefit? (Which is a benefit, but not as big as morons like to cry about. Have to get players here, build a team that makes them want to stay first.)100% depends on Bennet if he chooses to leave a lot of money that will certainly be available on July 1 (AAV and term for total dollars) to take quite a bit less to stay with the Panthers. Bennet would be looking at 50 mil on the open market. The Panthers, with Barkov and Lundel in the C1 and C2 roles) will not come close to that. More likely they’re offering 5 x 5. There’s going to be a big gap.
Stamkos and Bennett aren’t a good compatible at all. Different styles, different ages, etc. Tampas GM already had to correct one mistake in a departure by bringing McDonagh back, but he also overpaid guys like Sergachev who’s now on a different team. He overpaid a few guys, but locked in his core.Smart clubs move on from players who helped win but are getting older. Stamkos is the perfect example and he was right next door. Tampa used the money Stamkos wanted (and deserved) to bring in a player more suited to help the club win now and down the road. Stamkos left and got his money in Nashville. Tampa rolls on and so would the Panthers without Bennet.
What? Lol. You know how hard it is to win a cup? I would’ve killed for just 1. The rest is gravy.It’s going to be underwhelming if Zito locks all these guys in for 6+ years with NTCs and we only walk away with the one cup.
Bennett’s next contract will start at age 29. You actually believe he’s going to be playing 2C minutes, ahead of Lindell, as he ages into his 30’s?But, it’s an elite top 6 that plays extremely well together and employs the system at high end level to that point that it got us our first Cup. IMO it’s incredibly wise to lock this group up and see how much damage they can do. The cap is going to continue to go up, Bob and Ek come off the books soon so that will free up more money for the D, I’m really not sure what the concern is.
Agreed. As a day 1 fan, tbh honest much bigger fan after 96, I love this group and the work both the owners and management has done to get us here. Zito won’t go over the number and term he knows will work with the cap, and he’s earned our trust with it.
Of course it’s 100% up to him, but Zito will bring all the positives I mentioned to him and he clearly wants to keep him here. Benny is current in the 2C spot and if Lundy wants it, he’ll have to nudge Bennett out. Right now, we have one of the top center groups in the league, which (as I’ve mentioned) is paying off with Barkov out for a long stretch. There’s no negatives to keep Bennett and him choosing to stay. Sure, less money, but how much less with no sales tax benefit? (Which is a benefit, but not as big as morons like to cry about. Have to get players here, build a team that makes them want to stay first.)
Stamkos and Bennett aren’t a good compatible at all. Different styles, different ages, etc. Tampas GM already had to correct one mistake in a departure by bringing McDonagh back, but he also overpaid guys like Sergachev who’s now on a different team. He overpaid a few guys, but locked in his core.
Why’re you down on Bennett? I think the absolute opposite.
What are you actually arguing here? I don’t give a shit if Zito gives him 10, he won’t, but that’s up to Bennett and Zito. Bennett knows he can get more in FA, he also knows what he has here by staying. He played a big part in Tkachuk wanting to come here as well.Bennett’s next contract will start at age 29. You actually believe he’s going to be playing 2C minutes, ahead of Lindell, as he ages into his 30’s?
IMO Zito will not allocate more than 5 per to Bennet with term of 5-6 years. There will be clubs though, on July 1, 2025 that will offer him 7x7.
Not all players that play the way he does fall off, and he’s more intense in the playoffs than throughout the regular season. Further, last year he missed time due to Monty hitting him in the hand with a puck. He’s had injuries, but not to the level Ekblad has with his leg injuries.Because he has a history of injury and his game is the type that falls apart at his age.
So in your opinion a player should give up 20+ million to stay on a winning team?What are you actually arguing here? I don’t give a shit if Zito gives him 10, he won’t, but that’s up to Bennett and Zito. Bennett knows he can get more in FA, he also knows what he has here by staying. He played a big part in Tkachuk wanting to come here as well.
I don’t think Lindell has a chance of playing 2C ahead of Benny, but Lundell does. If Bennett moves to 3C he moves to 3C, it’s important to have center depth, especially the depth we have.
Not all players that play the way he does fall off, and he’s more intense in the playoffs than throughout the regular season. Further, last year he missed time due to Monty hitting him in the hand with a puck. He’s had injuries, but not to the level Ekblad has with his leg injuries.
IMO a player should do whatever tf they want. Bennett and Zito are in open negotiations atm. If he stays great, if he doesn’t, I wish him the best. Again, what’re you arguing?So in your opinion a player should give up 20+ million to stay on a winning team?