Shanahanigans
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2011
- 2,828
- 3,562
I will say that Skinner aside, high danger 5on5 chances yesterday were 10-10, and expected goals were about even. There is no reason we should be playing an "even" game vs the 30th in the league Sabres.
Wings showing how to beat Sabers
Maybe if guys like Nuge and Henrique showed a pulse we could score a few goals.7 goals for the Red Wings against the mighty Sabres.
Apparently we shouldn’t because it’s clear he’s the worst goalie ever or whatever.
Control what you can control. Can’t control the worst goalie ever! that isn’t going to change. I would like the team in front of him to get to where they were from Nov - January. You know, when they were winning games even with Skinner in net. They are in control of that.
Is that ok? To wish for the team to play how they were when they were winning even with Skinner? Or is asking for a baseline level of professionalism and competence from the skaters too much to ask?
If that game was played on Dec 10th and Skinner played identical we still win because we would score goals and not be utterly incompetent without the puck. This isn’t complicated.
Skinner blows and isn’t going to get better. The group in front has WAY more to give. Skinner isn’t going to start stealing games, but the team in front can certainly start doing the basics to win them. Just like they did for about 40games this season.
Do you want to know what the problem is with this logic?AND they gave up 3 goals! I was told it wasn’t possible to beat the Sabres giving up 3 goals.
What the hell?