ChiHawks10
Registered User
There's no chance in hell MHJ falls to #9.
There's no chance in hell MHJ falls to #9.
If Allen left after this year it's fine. It's a 4th, which is a small price to pay for helping your rookie QB acclimate to the NFL. Keeping 32 year old Allen isn't a priority, and certainly doesn't preclude the Bears from taking the BPA WR.You spend a 4th on a one year guy when you're clearly not a contender. I can understand the reason of the trade, getting a great help for Caleb but i think Allen will stay with us for two more years. That's why i don't see Odunze here as much as i want it to.
Agreed. I think the order of operations is like:I just don't see a DE at #9. If QB4 is still there, I think you trade down to 11-14 regardless if WR3 is there or not. If he isn't, I think the only way you pick a DE at #9 is if you have a massive medical flag on Latu, and even then you have 3 pass rushers in Turner, Verse and Murphy who could all fall to late teens (not including Newton although he might be an option too).
Of course, if the Bears think Verse is far and away the best pass rusher, they will and should take him. I just don't think he's excellent at either pass rushing or run defense. He feels like such a safe pick without immense upside at #9.
A good pass rusher is a good pass rusher.Dallas Turner does not fitl our defense at all.
YEP.I'm very anti-trade down unless JJ falls to us and someone overpays. Assuming JJ doesn't fall to us, we're guaranteed one of the WRs, Alt, or Turner. I'd rather take any of those then trade down. This team doesn't need depth at this point, it needs starts/blue chip guys. It made sense to trade down in the past to fill holes, but we don't really have many holes right now.
Take the star, then fill in the gaps going forward with (ideally) draft picks that aren't top-10. We have 2 2nds next year to patch up any weaknesses that emerge this year. We have plenty of time to draft in the high teens, this may be our last shot at the top 10 in awhile.
Yeah, everyone seems to think the Bears have Jared Verse ahead of him on their board.Dallas Turner does not fitl our defense at all.
You also need to consider the overall cap on the team and who would be up for contracts next off-season. How much less does Allen take on his next contract from the $23.1 mill he's making in 2024? You won't tag him, so he will be a complete free agent. Maybe he doesn't like the cold weather as he went to school at Cal and played for the Chargers in SD and LA.If Allen left after this year it's fine. It's a 4th, which is a small price to pay for helping your rookie QB acclimate to the NFL. Keeping 32 year old Allen isn't a priority, and certainly doesn't preclude the Bears from taking the BPA WR.
Thing is the top 4,5 wrs in this draft are so proven are juicy on paper. Id rather risk it and trade up somehow to get a wr (a second pick)than wait for the next year.You also need to consider the overall cap on the team and who would be up for contracts next off-season. How much less does Allen take on his next contract from the $23.1 mill he's making in 2024? You won't tag him, so he will be a complete free agent. Maybe he doesn't like the cold weather as he went to school at Cal and played for the Chargers in SD and LA.
Chicago doesn't have to take a WR this draft in round 1. If they end up with a DE that's also fine. They can always look for a WR in 2025, plus they currently have 2 seconds in 2025 to use to get one.
At this point, it would seem like 4QBs and 2WRs and Alt the OT should go off the board in the first 7 picks. Really on ATL and if they do end up trading down if another team is looking to jump the Bears for that WR3. ATL on paper should not require an Offensive player, but who knows.Thing is the top 4,5 wrs in this draft are so proven are juicy on paper. Id rather risk it and trade up somehow to get a wr (a second pick)than wait for the next year.
Diggs has gotta be a problem behind the scenes or something.