Speculation: Based on the past 3 games are the Bruins now buyers or sellers on March 1st?

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,771
19,262
Connecticut
They should sell...I won't be fooled by this team again....yeah they just reeled off 3 nice W's in a row....But I have seen this before....they will lose and then we will all be right back here *****ing and moaning about how this team sucks.

They aren't good enough. Yet.

That's why the west coast swing will be telling. They'll face off against 3 western conference playoff teams and high scoring Dallas team and a Yotes team that is till a disaster.

If they go 4-1 on the trip, I think they become buyers. Not saying they'll throw everything away from rentals, but they'll be looking at pieces that can help now and in the future.
 

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,682
21,588
Victoria BC
Like to see a bit of both if that`s possible, rid themselves of those named Hayes/Liles, try to secure that 3rd round pick for Moore to get back the pick they lost with the deals last year and I`d move one of Quaider/K Miller


I think with the right acquisitions, this team can remove some pieces, get something back and still play at a high level
 

WhalerTurnedBruin55

Fading out, thanks for the times.
Oct 31, 2008
11,347
6,720
Absolutely no rentals, unless it's to fill out roster spots or cap for bigger deals.

Long term game, Donny. Long term.
 

RustyBruins72

Registered User
Jul 29, 2005
4,823
1,967
Buy. Give it a shot now. Team has a fresh attitude.

I think I agree but to a point.

I'm not big on trading a first round pick for Hanzal or a true rental.

If they get Lando and Tuytin for a package where the goal is for long term, then yes, buy.

I always thought this team wasn't that far off.

The 3 wins set them up very well for this week off and teams chasing with GIH. We will see where they are at week's end and then they need to get off to a good start on the road.

It was said in another thread, if DS can do a deal without Carlo and Mac, I'll be thrilled!
 

Salem13

Registered User
Feb 6, 2008
5,624
1,507
Salem,Mass
Sellers_pinkpanther7.jpg
 

whatsbruin

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,630
2,569
Central, NY
I think I agree but to a point.

I'm not big on trading a first round pick for Hanzal or a true rental.

If they get Lando and Tuytin for a package where the goal is for long term, then yes, buy.

I always thought this team wasn't that far off.

The 3 wins set them up very well for this week off and teams chasing with GIH. We will see where they are at week's end and then they need to get off to a good start on the road.

It was said in another thread, if DS can do a deal without Carlo and Mac, I'll be thrilled!
I buy the best non-rental young D man they can get, with hopefully 2017 picks and some of the lesser profile draft picks. This means one of K miller or McQuaid is gone as well.
 

bossfan

Registered User
Apr 5, 2008
2,098
569
Reality check time.

San Jose - a good team obviously but they were on an east coast trip and slumping at the same time.

Vancouver - not a very good team. Barely beat them but a good win.

Montreal - after their really good start they have been a .500 team for the last 40 games or so. So let's not be fooled that they beat a real good team. A good win though because of how historically bad the B's have been against them.

B's are experiencing the "new coach bump" but the coaching change did not fix the holes in the lineup. So my vote is sellers for the right deal that will help to fix them long term.

Now if they have a good west coast trip then opinions may change. But still don't want them to buy for a short term playoff run when they have long term needs.
 

bruins19

Registered User
Aug 11, 2005
1,650
3,137
Like to see a bit of both if that`s possible, rid themselves of those named Hayes/Liles, try to secure that 3rd round pick for Moore to get back the pick they lost with the deals last year and I`d move one of Quaider/K Miller


I think with the right acquisitions, this team can remove some pieces, get something back and still play at a high level

I agree. Complicating factor this year is that we need to hold on to someone to expose for the expansion draft. Lose your deadwood early and you may risk losing a keeper...
 

OldScool

Registered User
Nov 27, 2007
4,804
639
Cant sell hot dogs if there arent any playoff home games....Bruins will buy when then they should sell...per usual.
 

Bad Puck Bounce

Run Ralphie Run
Feb 4, 2014
2,846
29
Denver, Colorado
I voted buy but, I want to see how they do on the West Coast trip. If they can take 2 or 3 of those games I'm on board to buy. Don't see rentals being a good fit unless it's something cheap to improve the bottom lines significantly.

Just be smart Sweeney.
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,046
11,188
NWO
As many in this thread have said, no to rentals yes to anyone who helps us past this year
 

Gordon Lightfoot

Hey Dotcom. Nice to meet you.
Sponsor
Feb 3, 2009
18,936
5,416
I really don't know. I've never been more on the fence about a team. I want to believe but it's like being lied to repeatedly... and then coming back for more. My head says: this team has too many holes and is going to finish in 9th place. My heart says: let's just go for it, you only live once, we have our best guys who are right in their primes. So I don't know.

Eh, **** it. Let's buy.
 

talkinaway

Registered User
Mar 19, 2014
6,973
4,126
On the couch
Monorail Monorail Monorail !



I agree with Fenway. The front office, and the Jacobs in particular, don't want to be seen at all as tanking, or not making a "full effort" to make the playoffs. They'd rather have 5 years of one-and-done playoffs than miss the playoffs 4 times and have one deep run. I can see that - it's more profitable to them.

Missing the playoffs twice in a row when it was literally promised to the fans by the captain of the team, and after the threat last year of Charlie (or was it the year before?) puts the Bruins in danger of losing the fan base. That means empty seats, and not because of winter weather. The glow of a Stanley Cup only lasts so long.

The Bruins will do anything they can to make the playoffs. There's only 5 games until the deadline - all against the West, so no "bonus points" for taking a game from a divisional, or even a conference, rival. California will be critical. So will the games by other teams. If we're in playoff position, or within 2-3 points of playoff position, they'll buy.

That could be dangerous. I still have nightmares about our Western Canada/Midwest trip two years ago, which is, IMO, when the Bruins started to go off the rails. We've got that trip in March, after the deadline, and if we only get 1 or 2 points there, we're going to be in a bad place.
 

CharasLazyWrister

Registered User
Sep 8, 2008
24,916
22,113
Lunenburg, MA
As much as it is obvious to me that a change in philosophy and system is clearly benefiting this team (the team is simply better suited to be offensive than defensive), I need to see more.

As someone else said, I need to evaluate after this road trip.

I'm still heavily leaning toward sellers, but if they do something crazy like go 3-0-0 on this road trip, I'll reconsider. As happy as I am about what Cassidy is doing, I feel like I'd be naive to think it's all better and a coaching change is all that we needed to be a playoff contender this year.

Still think there are too many spare parts that need to be replaced with legitimate players, and I don't see that happening whether we are buyers or sellers during a trade deadline.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad