GloryDaze4877
Barely Irrelevant
Regardless of who was on the ice/who's fault it was, you're not going to win games scoring 1 goal.
I'm with you on this.
Team gives up only two goals, they should win the majority of those games.
Regardless of who was on the ice/who's fault it was, you're not going to win games scoring 1 goal.
It seemed like "piling on Bart" because some people defended his actions on that play. Literally no one denied Bergeron really ****ed up. So only one of those guys led to conversation. Hell, Seidenberg generated more conversation too.
The board 100% agrees Bergeron ****ed up. I don't know what to say about it though. I mean, how often does he do that? If you have a closer that just made forty straight saves you don't really have to talk much if he blows the 41st, know what I mean?
In this analogy Bartkowski is John Wasdin.
And he blew the save because Nomad bobbled a grounder, threw late and low to Vaughn who couldn't scoop it allowing the inherited runner that Pedro walked to score. About the same level of responsibility Bart had here.
I'm not going to keep debating this with you. We disagree. How many times can we disagree before you don't care? For me it is apparently 5 times.
that whole play was a mess, and shows how much of a mess our team was on defensive coverage.
including bergie.
But, bottom line is any defenseman with some hockey sense, doesnt leave a man behind him like that. in front of the net. you stay at the front of the net and keep the play in front of you.
looks like he tried telling bergie to cover the slot guy. Bergie obviously didnt hear him or see his motioning. But Bart still shouldnt of left his post. Especially with 2 seconds left. a smart defenseman knows the time and what can be done in said time.
also-m bart has no business being out there under a minute in a tie game.
Blaming Bart for that goal is silly. Bergy, seids put him in that situation. Even Svedberg could've done a better job of poking the puck away.
It seemed like "piling on Bart" because some people defended his actions on that play. Literally no one denied Bergeron really ****ed up. So only one of those guys led to conversation. Hell, Seidenberg generated more conversation too.
The board 100% agrees Bergeron ****ed up. I don't know what to say about it though. I mean, how often does he do that? If you have a closer that just made forty straight saves you don't really have to talk much if he blows the 41st, know what I mean?
In this analogy Bartkowski is John Wasdin.
Sure you are. I absolutely hate when people say this.
Bergeron made a mistake. A rare mistake, but everyone makes them...even him. His tend to get pointed out and forgiven rather quickly because they are rare, while others get piled on when they do something wrong because they aren't as consistent.
Patrice Bergeron is our best all around player. When he ****s up, it's more easily forgiven because of that, and because he realistically makes what amounts to a handful of costly mistakes throughout the course of a season.
He's not above criticism, he's forgiven more easily...and rightfully so, IMO. There's a huge difference.
Bingo.
Where was Sides? Where was Bergeron? I didn't see any comments from either taking responsibility. To me, that's more disturbing than the goal itself. I don't want to make too big a deal out of it, but after a game like that, why are we getting two paragraphs of Bart taking responsibility and nothing from the vets? Maybe I just missed that?
How is this still a topic? Bart came out and admitted he was wrong. How much more do you need??!
Was thinking the same thing. Maybe they did, and it just didn't make it into the press, but at the very least I hope those vets said something in the room by way of a mea culpa. I can't imagine they didn't.
Regardless of who was on the ice/who's fault it was, you're not going to win games scoring 1 goal.
Bergeron and 2 second rounds picks to the Islanders for Johnny Boychuk.
e4
Totally off topic, but Dan and I were talking yesterday and throwing stuff around jokingly.
Would you deal Bergeron for Coyle and Brodin?
I said no to PB, but yes to DK.
Everybody knows I dont believe in untouchable players.
But Bergeron is about damn close as I can get.
I dont trade him.
Totally off topic, but Dan and I were talking yesterday and throwing stuff around jokingly.
Would you deal Bergeron for Coyle and Brodin?
I said no to PB, but yes to DK.
For Krejci maybe.. but I don't know why Minny would do that deal. They have Koivu and Granlund. Krejci isn't a 3C.