Barracuda just played a video with several “guaranteed dates” for next season, including the season opener on October 19. Very early to be announcing that.
2-0 Cuda after one.
2-0 Cuda after one.
Last edited:
3 of those came in one game which obviously very good but 2 in 4 doesn’t sound great.5 points in 5 games for Bystedt. He's gonna be a good one.
You're right, he should score exactly one point each game. Confirmed bust.3 of those came in one game which obviously very good but 2 in 4 doesn’t sound great.
Yep because that’s what I saidYou're right, he should score exactly one point each game. Confirmed bust.
What's the issue? You convinced me he's a bust.Yep because that’s what I said
Has nothing to do with you missing context yet again. Everyone else is the issue.
Yep again here’s you putting words in peoples mouths. Like you always do.What's the issue? You convinced me he's a bust.
It's actually even worse than you described. If you just look at the 4/6 game against Ontario, Bystedt has 0 points in 1 game. He should probably start in the ECHL next season tbh.
He’s just messing with you.Yep again here’s you putting words in peoples mouths. Like you always do.
You came in and posted his stat sheet. I added the context that yes it’s good but not as good as it looks at first glance. Back to the old Hodge I see. Fun. Welcome back to the ignore list.
Yep again here’s you putting words in peoples mouths. Like you always do.
You came in and posted his stat sheet. I added the context that yes it’s good but not as good as it looks at first glance. Back to the old Hodge I see. Fun. Welcome back to the ignore list.
The point is his stint isn’t as good as it looks. How is that totally unwarranted?It’s exactly as good as it looks, taking out the best game is totally unwarranted, or did the Cuda play a bunch of 5 year old three legged puppies that night?
Problem is, the sample size is way way way too short to draw any conclusion (especially if you both just argue with points, which isn’t a good starting point)
The point is his stint isn’t as good as it looks. How is that totally unwarranted?
Based on the fact that he has 2 points in 4 games outside of one extremely good offensive game. It’s disingenuous to say “oh he’s going to be great because of 5 points in 5 games” when it’s clearly lacking context.Based on what?
This kid has been playing his whole life in bigger sized rinks. As I understand it, that adjustment is not easy. Even with that, he came out of the gates with 2 goals. Was that great? I’m sure he thought so. The fans thought so. I thought so. You don’t agree, tempering your expectations is your right.Based on the fact that he has 2 points in 4 games outside of one extremely good offensive game. It’s disingenuous to say “oh he’s going to be great because of 5 points in 5 games” when it’s clearly lacking context.
He’s been fine. He’s not been bad but he really hasn’t been the level you’d expect a PPG player.
This post means nothing man.This kid has been playing his whole life in bigger sized rinks. As I understand it, that adjustment is not easy. Even with that, he came out of the gates with 2 goals. Was that great? I’m sure he thought so. The fans thought so. I thought so. You don’t agree, tempering your expectations is your right.
The other way of looking at it is that a PPG even in this SSS is pretty impressive considering he is adjusting, and Bystedt himself even said he's not happy with a lot of aspects of his game. Just imagine him when he is playing well!The point is his stint isn’t as good as it looks. How is that totally unwarranted?