Barkov spears Letang in the nuts called for major - after review the NHL/refs reduce call to minor Slashing penalty (mod edit) | Page 3 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Barkov spears Letang in the nuts called for major - after review the NHL/refs reduce call to minor Slashing penalty (mod edit)

After reviewing the footage starting with 02:13 I agree that he does not hit him in the nuts with the blade, but probably the shaft. Secondly after watching that replay 10 times I have no idea what Barkov is doing, other than being frustrated and just whipping his stick anywhere he likes. Previously I said a 5 + game misconduct would be enough. Upon further review I would make that a 2 game suspension, especially since he only got 2 in the game, it was really reckless.

Thanks for pointing out the main principal of contact though, that was very clearly seen on last replay which was the one I had watched the least of. Very rare to see the shaft being the main point of contact btw.
What’s more likely?

That Aleksander Barkov, a Lady Byng trophy winner, with 122 total penalty minutes in his ENTIRE 10 year career finally snapped and cup checked someone,

OR Barkov, one of the best defensive sticks in the NHL, was going for a stick lift and accidentally hit Letang in the balls?

Either way, the penalty for a cup check has been 2 minutes for a very long time. You disagree. I actually agree with you. Intentionally cup checking someone should be 5 and a game.

Now stop crying about it and move on.
 
Swinging your stick up at a player isn't usually a penalty unless it hits their face (high-sticking) or arms (sometimes called as hooking)

And what the rulebook explicitly says does not matter. This is not a legal document. What is more important is the spirit of the rules. There are a variety of illegal acts that are not explicitly forbidden by the rulebook.
Exactly. The rule book is shit. It should be explicit about what is an illegal act and what isn't. There should be NO room for interpretation. But the NHL does not want that. They want to be able to influence games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dessloch
What’s more likely?

That Aleksander Barkov, a Lady Byng trophy winner, with 122 total penalty minutes in his ENTIRE 10 year career finally snapped and cup checked someone,

OR Barkov, one of the best defensive sticks in the NHL, was going for a stick lift and accidentally hit Letang in the balls?

Either way, the penalty for a cup check has been 2 minutes for a very long time. You disagree. I actually agree with you. Intentionally cup checking someone should be 5 and a game.

Now stop crying about it and move on.

Yes, Barkov was clearly just going for a stick lift but was a second late and missed by 2 feet.

?????????????
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dessloch and Zbynek
Yes, Barkov was clearly just going for a stick lift but was a second late and missed by 2 feet.

?????????????
They player in question matters here. Barkov literally has nothing close to a dirty play in his entire career. In fact I think he has only one roughing penalty in 10 years. It’s so out of character that he gets every benefit of the doubt.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Laus723
Could have been worse, he could have cross-checked Letang in the knee.
Apparently you aren't quite up to date on what Barkov finally did say. It's really strange that it took 12 days and he waited until after the 2nd game with the Devils for him to speak up. But the Panther media, some of the fans, and of course the Neanderthal Tkachuk went after Nico like he speared Barkov in the nuts.


I hope Pittsburgh treats Barkov the same way the Panthers treated Nico.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Laus723
Apparently you aren't quite up to date on what Barkov finally did say. It's really strange that it took 12 days and he waited until after the 2nd game with the Devils for him to speak up. But the Panther media, some of the fans, and of course the Neanderthal Tkachuk went after Nico like he speared Barkov in the nuts.


I hope Pittsburgh treats Barkov the same when the Panthers treated Nico.

Weapons grade cope.

Guys get mad and do dirty stuff in hockey games. Happens all the time. See: this thread.
 
Barkov going full on jock douche bag. If the camera would have stayed on him, you would have seen him skate quietly behind Malkin and yank his draws down around his ankles.
I hear that next game he's going to tape Larry Lester's buns together. Won't earn him that five minute major, but might land him in all day Saturday detention.
 
Pathetic display of reffing in Florida last night.
Lmao, Pens didn’t get their typical titles game in their favor?
Find a second video of Crosby doing this.
Here’s a whole article. He literally squared up with Valábik’s but sack in 08 (found that hilarious article, from 17 btw, as I looked for the valabik nonsense). He poked Ek last time they played.

Next time make a thread after Sid next pops someone’s balls, the player safety angle will seem a bit more sincere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: teugen
Lmao, Pens didn’t get their typical titles game in their favor?

Here’s a whole article. He literally squared up with Valábik’s but sack in 08 (found that hilarious article, from 17 btw, as I looked for the valabik nonsense). He poked Ek last time they played.

Next time make a thread after Sid next pops someone’s balls, the player safety angle will seem a bit more sincere.
Both plays are dirty. What's your point? They don't cancel each other out. Neither of these plays belong in the game
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dessloch
It really looks more like Barkov thinks he can lift the stick there and with Letang's leg is up, he catches up where he shouldn't. I can see that being 2 minutes instead of 5.
 
It really looks more like Barkov thinks he can lift the stick there and with Letang's leg is up, he catches up where he shouldn't. I can see that being 2 minutes instead of 5.
The context before this play was there was a few big hits exchanged, first by Dumoulin on Barkov and then Bennett on Letang. It wasn't random.

The most bizarre part is how the refs gave Pettersson and Tkachuk 10 min game misconducts for scrumming after the play but Barkov only got 2 minutes.

They player in question matters here. Barkov literally has nothing close to a dirty play in his entire career. In fact I think he has only one roughing penalty in 10 years. It’s so out of character that he gets every benefit of the doubt.
Ah yes exactly and K'Andre Miller accidentally spat in Doughtys face. Logic is spot on with this post
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dessloch
Boris Valabik should be happy that Crosby punched him in the balls during the Bush administration because otherwise absolutely nobody would remember who he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zbynek
I am sure you would be unaffected if you had ruptured testicle, tough guy!

If protecting the players safety is dramatic, then so be it! I dont think its dramatic at all, just common sense.
Settle down there soft guy!

Some of the comments in this thread are embarrassing
 
Swinging your stick up at a player isn't usually a penalty unless it hits their face (high-sticking) or arms (sometimes called as hooking)

And what the rulebook explicitly says does not matter. This is not a legal document. What is more important is the spirit of the rules. There are a variety of illegal acts that are not explicitly forbidden by the rulebook.

Yes, that's why I specifically wrote swinging the stick up/down. If I meant swinging the stick only in an upwards motion, I would have written as such.
 
You do know that "spearing" is hitting someone with the toe of the stick, right
yeah I came here to comment that the league has been strangely tolerant of players spearing each other in the nuts. But seeing the replay that's not what this was.

Barkov has his stick through Letang's legs but the end of his stick actually slashed Letang's hands. This wasn't a spear to the nards.

I can understand how the refs thought it was a spear then saw the replay.
 
Both plays are dirty. What's your point? They don't cancel each other out. Neither of these plays belong in the game
Whole point is that’s it’s both insincere and hilarious that someone e posts Barkov of all people on a nut shot as some giant issue when Sid has done it over and over again. Literally had my point in my post.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dessloch

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad