CupsOverCash
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2009
- 16,558
- 7,326
You would still be speaking German if it wasn't for us.I like to say from a political standpoint, this final was like 1972 and 1980. But this time the Americans played the role once performed by the Russians.
Sure. You're digressing by stating an inaccurate, Hollywoodized statement. But, sure.You would still be speaking German if it wasn't for us.
Sooooo, is that a yes or no?When does the Canadian football team want to play our best NFL players? Can they take them to ot or beat them? He'll no. Our best athletes six feet and over for the most part don't dream of playing hockey. Hockey is like 4th or 5th in the popularity department in thr states for adults and minors. In Canada hockey is everything and their best players want to be hockey players. Kind of wild they split 1-1 with usa with an OT win and you are acting like they are worlds apart. Canada hasn't won a cup this millennium and the US markets are. If anything Canadiam hockey is losing the huge talent gal it had over tne rest of the world this millennium.
When does the Canadian football team want to play our best NFL players? Can they take them to ot or beat them? He'll no. Our best athletes six feet and over for the most part don't dream of playing hockey. Hockey is like 4th or 5th in the popularity department in thr states for adults and minors. In Canada hockey is everything and their best players want to be hockey players. Kind of wild they split 1-1 with usa with an OT win and you are acting like they are worlds apart. Canada hasn't won a cup this millennium and the US markets are. If anything Canadiam hockey is losing the huge talent gal it had over tne rest of the world this millennium.
We could also go the other way with it. If Canada had Pietrangelo and Theodore for the championship game, the ice tilts back towards them. I'm not really sure how far, or whether it makes defense in their favor in the first place, but it's food for thought. There's always food for thought about who's missing when it comes to short tournaments like this. Finland missing Heiskanen was also a huge blow. Arguably a much bigger blow than us missing Hughes, in terms of relative value to their teams (I'm not saying Heiskanen is a better player than Hughes, because he isn't).
'
96 Canada was deeper upfront IMO and definitely in net. I would take Gretzky, Messier, Yzerman, Sakic, Shanahan ,Fleury, Brind'Amour, Graves, Linden over McDavid, McKinnon, Point, Crosby, Marner, Ranheim, Bennett, Hagel and Marchand I know they were an older group but they were deeper.
US goali was better in net with Richter. D was a bit better with Leetch, Chelios, Suter, Hatcher, Schneider. Forwards had Hull, Modano, Lafontaine, Leclair, Amonte, Guerin Tkachuk and Weight..
5 currently in the HOF on '96 US Team, while I think you will see 4 max on this US Team.
plays the USA in our sport
The best Canadian players don't even want to play for Canadian nhl teams for the most part. They want to come to the USA for freedom , better tax situations , and a place where your dollar goes further. The only free agent Canadians teams have been signing are over aged players chasing their last contact like Tavares to trams foolish enough to pay them that much.
The best Canadian players don't even want to play for Canadian nhl teams for the most part. They want to come to the USA for freedom , better tax situations , and a place where your dollar goes further. The only free agent Canadians teams have been signing are over aged players chasing their last contact like Tavares to trams foolish enough to pay them that much.
Meh I don't buy the top rival rhetoric, Canada literally always beats the US in final games, its nearly 100% lopsided, the margins are irrelevant, a team that consistently beats another is not a rival, its a punching bag. There needs to be a back and forth for it to actually be considered a legitimate rival.
View attachment 980753
I'm not even mad. You guys split with thr usa in a secondary us sport in as Canada calls it our game. Play the USA and our game American football and see what happens. Hockey is an amazing sport but Canada isn't as dominate as it was at Hockey. They could only split a series and win in ot versus the US.You know if you really need to you can just have a nice cry about the game, get it out and move on right?
There's always next year.
Hey your back! Rough few days, eh?Weren't Canadians talking about their Basketball team challenging the USA not too long ago, how'd that turn out for ya?![]()
I'm not even mad. You guys split with thr usa in a secondary us sport in as Canada calls it our game. Play the USA and our game American football and see what happens. Hockey is an amazing sport but Canada isn't as dominate as it was at Hockey. They could only split a series and win in ot versus the US.
Who cares.... no excuses just facts.Dude, you're so mad you're making constant spelling and grammar mistakes as you mash the keyboard to spit out these excuses.
Like comparing the current political climate between the US and Canada to the Cold War? Settle down, Tom Clancy.Sure. You're digressing by stating an inaccurate, Hollywoodized statement. But, sure.
It's been a rough few weeks.Hey your back! Rough few days, eh?
Yup. Canada is king at hockey. It’s a hockey forum.When does the Canadian football team want to play our best NFL players? Can they take them to ot or beat them? He'll no. Our best athletes six feet and over for the most part don't dream of playing hockey. Hockey is like 4th or 5th in the popularity department in thr states for adults and minors. In Canada hockey is everything and their best players want to be hockey players. Kind of wild they split 1-1 with usa with an OT win and you are acting like they are worlds apart. Canada hasn't won a cup this millennium and the US markets are. If anything Canadiam hockey is losing the huge talent gal it had over tne rest of the world this millennium. If Canada sent their best basketball, American football, or baseball players to play a series it wouldn't even be competitive or close. Enjoy the win but the US is getting closer and closer to producing the same talent as Canada. It may even switch to us player where best Canadian players can now come play in universities allowing the us kids to player better talent earlier.
So is Canada plays the USA in our sport American football the opening line would be 196-0.
I don't disagree that the narratives are lazy. That's the point I was trying to make too.The narratives are lazy.
If USA barely won the first game then I cannot imagine how you describe the second game being decided in OT, an OT dominated by team USA.
Canada lost two games as well. The spin on narratives is missing the mark.
Matthews simply needs to play like an offensive superstar. McAvoy and Hughes need to be healthy. Tkachuk needs to not be selfish and waste two games benching himself.
These variables add up quickly.
Canada should worry about improving its goaltending pipeline. It will haunt them at some point.