Confirmed with Link: Avs sign Kovalenko to 2-year deal

EdAVSfan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2009
7,771
4,884
Best thing for Kovalenko here is that he’s going to a team that legitimately targeted and wanted him, rather than being a throw in to a trade.

I’m sure he will get opportunity in SJ that likely wasnt possible here.
 

Murzu

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 23, 2013
6,788
10,273
Finland
Damn.. I was a Kovy fan. I could see him becoming a very good 3rd liner.

Best of luck in San Jose. He brings a little something different to them.

Maybe our paths cross sometime again
 
  • Like
Reactions: expatriatedtexan
Aug 17, 2005
19,279
16,180


Played 9:23 on a line with (I think) Dellandrea and Avs legend Nico Sturm.

Gamescore graphs just seem clunky to me...I think this is saying he had a net positive game and appears to have had a larger and more positive contribution to the game than his linemates, assuming it was those two.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
48,294
31,686
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Gamescore graphs just seem clunky to me...I think this is saying he had a net positive game and appears to have had a larger and more positive contribution to the game than his linemates, assuming it was those two.
It’s such an insanely small sample size it really doesn’t matter, especially considering those few minutes were likely sheltered ones. But hey, first game with a new team and new system, not bad.
 

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,769
32,198
It's too bad that the Avs waited so long for him to come over, and finally had another home grown bottom 6'er outside of LOC, but had to move him to address the goaltending.

Even if he doesn't become a great 3rd liner, he still looks like a legit NHLer, and the Avs have trouble finding those in the draft outside the 1st round.

Goaltending is the more important position though so it had to be done.
 
Aug 17, 2005
19,279
16,180
It's too bad that the Avs waited so long for him to come over, and finally had another home grown bottom 6'er outside of LOC, but had to move him to address the goaltending.

Even if he doesn't become a great 3rd liner, he still looks like a legit NHLer, and the Avs have trouble finding those in the draft outside the 1st round.

Goaltending is the more important position though so it had to be done.
Yep. Can't say that I enjoyed the fact he was the piece, but you do HAVE to give to get. No GMs are doing favors (on purpose). I think I'm happier with the potential of having a goalie tandem that will give the team a chance the whole way through this run more than I am enamoured in having a Kovalenko play for the Avs for a decade or so. His dad was part of the Patrick Roy trade. It makes sense that he would be part of a goalie trade for us as well.

There's something to be said for symmetry. Last time we traded a Kovalenko for a goalie it resulted in a Stanley Cup. I for one am hoping for a little history repeating iteself here.
 

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,769
32,198
Yep. Can't say that I enjoyed the fact he was the piece, but you do HAVE to give to get. No GMs are doing favors (on purpose). I think I'm happier with the potential of having a goalie tandem that will give the team a chance the whole way through this run more than I am enamoured in having a Kovalenko play for the Avs for a decade or so. His dad was part of the Patrick Roy trade. It makes sense that he would be part of a goalie trade for us as well.

There's something to be said for symmetry. Last time we traded a Kovalenko for a goalie it resulted in a Stanley Cup. I for one am hoping for a little history repeating iteself here.

Forgot about that. Nice anecdote.
 

The Kingslayer

Registered User
Aug 26, 2004
77,581
58,711
Siem Reap, Cambodia
It's too bad that the Avs waited so long for him to come over, and finally had another home grown bottom 6'er outside of LOC, but had to move him to address the goaltending.

Even if he doesn't become a great 3rd liner, he still looks like a legit NHLer, and the Avs have trouble finding those in the draft outside the 1st round.

Goaltending is the more important position though so it had to be done.
The Avs could have kept Kovy and gotten Blackwood in the offseason for next to nothing. CMac slept and it cost the Avs Kovy and a second to address a problem they knew was a problem after Game 6
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
26,752
10,840
Michigan
Yep. Can't say that I enjoyed the fact he was the piece, but you do HAVE to give to get. No GMs are doing favors (on purpose). I think I'm happier with the potential of having a goalie tandem that will give the team a chance the whole way through this run more than I am enamoured in having a Kovalenko play for the Avs for a decade or so. His dad was part of the Patrick Roy trade. It makes sense that he would be part of a goalie trade for us as well.

There's something to be said for symmetry. Last time we traded a Kovalenko for a goalie it resulted in a Stanley Cup. I for one am hoping for a little history repeating iteself here.

How long before the Altitude crew figures this out and jinx the shit out of us?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: expatriatedtexan

NOTENOUGHRYJOTHINGS

Registered User
Oct 23, 2022
2,264
4,617
Yep. Can't say that I enjoyed the fact he was the piece, but you do HAVE to give to get. No GMs are doing favors (on purpose). I think I'm happier with the potential of having a goalie tandem that will give the team a chance the whole way through this run more than I am enamoured in having a Kovalenko play for the Avs for a decade or so. His dad was part of the Patrick Roy trade. It makes sense that he would be part of a goalie trade for us as well.

There's something to be said for symmetry. Last time we traded a Kovalenko for a goalie it resulted in a Stanley Cup. I for one am hoping for a little history repeating iteself here.
I bet the Sharks take another second or a third instead. A goalie with no future for your franchise for two decent picks? Although they did have to take back a retained Georgie. I think Cmac values Kovalenko as approximately a fourth round pick.
 

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,769
32,198
The Avs could have kept Kovy and gotten Blackwood in the offseason for next to nothing. CMac slept and it cost the Avs Kovy and a second to address a problem they knew was a problem after Game 6

Can you remind me of the circumstances on that? I was checked out most of the summer on hockey.

I wonder what the price was without Georgiev though?

Even if some wanted him gone during the summer, I think it makes sense why the Avs would want to give George a shot again after the playoffs. I'm more surprised at their willingness to go with a still unproven Annunen as back up.

Annunen's spot should have been the one for Blackwood to start the season, and then they could have battled it out, but perhaps SJ needed a goaltender in return. Hard to tell how interested SJ might have been in Justus.

I wonder if the Avs mistake was that they got lulled into keeping Annunen, instead of making a similar deal with Justus + Kovy + for Blackwood?
 

Ad

Ad

Ad