Proposal: AVS & HABS
- Thread starter Lockin17
- Start date
Theodore450
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2013
- 4,581
- 2,342
Deam78
Registered User
- Aug 16, 2017
- 2,039
- 1,460
izzy
go
I mean, I haven't kept up with Byram lately, but personally don't hate the idea because it's currently a position of weakness but I think both teams stay pat, Montreal needs caufield as he's the only legit sniper prospect we've had in an eon and we do have a glut of D prospects
The Moose is Loose
Registered User
Not a chance I give up Byram for Caufield.
Why would the Avs consider not running Byram-Makar for the next decade to grab a small RW who wouldn’t even make it near the top line with Rantanen there?
Byram is and always has been the higher caliber prospect.
Why would the Avs consider not running Byram-Makar for the next decade to grab a small RW who wouldn’t even make it near the top line with Rantanen there?
Byram is and always has been the higher caliber prospect.
Lockin17
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2018
- 3,646
- 2,794
Lockin17
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2018
- 3,646
- 2,794
Namikaze Minato
Registered User
Habs would be more inclined to do this deal than Colorado, based purely on franchise needs but would still pass, I think.
Edit: But Good proposal by OP actually, it would make you think for sure and that's pretty rare with highly touted players in a 1 for 1 deal.
Edit: But Good proposal by OP actually, it would make you think for sure and that's pretty rare with highly touted players in a 1 for 1 deal.
Foppberg
Registered User
JoeSakic13
Registered User
They’re both amazing prospects in their own ways, but it would make no sense to move either of them.
Maybe on PS4, but that’s it.
Maybe on PS4, but that’s it.
I’m sure you would. And if we’re trading Caufield I’d rather trade for Makar. Wouldn’t happen though
CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 39,504
- 13,910
CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 39,504
- 13,910
Of course you would.
That's like saying "if we're trading Suzuki, I'd rather trade for MacKinnon."
Just kind of silly to even bring that up. Of course there's zero chance of that.
Perennial
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2020
- 3,492
- 1,523
Kudos OP!
Very interesting proposal...
I'm inclined to say that unless there's something specific about Byram's game that is cause for concern, it's a gamble worth taking from Montreal's perspective given their depth at RW
Not sure Caufield's tantalizing talent would be enough to part with Byram from Colorado's perspective... unless of course they've seen something specific about his game that is cause for concern in the time he's been in their organization
Very interesting proposal...
I'm inclined to say that unless there's something specific about Byram's game that is cause for concern, it's a gamble worth taking from Montreal's perspective given their depth at RW
Not sure Caufield's tantalizing talent would be enough to part with Byram from Colorado's perspective... unless of course they've seen something specific about his game that is cause for concern in the time he's been in their organization
Foppberg
Registered User
Of course you would.
That's like saying "if we're trading Suzuki, I'd rather trade for MacKinnon."
Just kind of silly to even bring that up. Of course there's zero chance of that.
CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 39,504
- 13,910
Ah, make a shit counter proposal (idea/suggestion/whatever), then sit back and watch the world burn. I like it.
Avs easily decline but it’s not insulting like past nonsense proposals of Tatar for Byram or Drouin for Girard.
at least Montreal is parting with young value this time.
habs add Guhle. Avs add Sampo Ranta and I’m more interested.
Yes. Sort of.
But Byram > Caufield.
Gotta make the value match. Sampo is a rookie third line LW. He’s not a nobody. He carries some legit value.
Byram just scored a sick wrist shot. Took the puck off Dach’s stick, then drilled him into the boards 20 seconds later. He’s going to be a top pair D.
Last edited:
