Romang67
BitterSwede
What's wrong with calculations based on assumptions?I don't know about you, but I trust him because his opinion is echoed by the GMs in the NHL.
Varly was the Vezina runner up in 2014, with a legitimate case for winning it. He was also 4th in the Hart vote.
While in Colorado, Kuemper didn't get a single vote for the Vezina.
Why should we trust GSAx as anything other than a fun calculation based on assumptions?
The assumption in GSAx is really just that the past reflects the future. If a shot from a certain area of the ice with certain puck movement before the shot often has resulted in goals in the past, it has a high chance of doing so here too. This thinking is why the cross-ice one-timer is so common on the PP.