Sabresfansince1980
Registered User
There are many that believe that, but I disagree with that notion. There are certain pieces that are needed to build a Cup team... you need a 1C, 1D, 2C, top line (if not star) winger, starting goalie that won't shit the bed, shutdown defensemen, etc. IF the BPA is only LD and you just keep drafting them, you won't ever have a team. I'm very much a draft your core and get your toughest pieces, then filter in the rest.
This is a team that drafted Reinhart, Eichel, Mitts, and Cozens with top 10 picks within 6 drafts. Along with getting ROR first and then Thompson from ROR in that span. There are only so many guys you can put at center. In a vacuum you can argue that any of those picks/moves were right at the end of the day, it loses sight of finding a way to build a team. Swap Cozens for Boldy or Knight and you probably have a different outlook.
They did it with LD too... they drafted Dahlin and Samuelsson in the same draft. Then another LD at 31 the next season. Then Power in 21. That's 4 LD in the first 32 picks in 4 years. Unsurprisingly, Johnson is having issues breaking into the league and certainly will have more trouble since they brought in Byram too. I'm not the biggest handedness person, but at least sprinkle in a RD. Get a two way winger with size and grit. Get a high end talent winger. Don't just draft the same positions and players over and over again.
They drafted all that talent, and seemingly were going to die on the prospect development hill. Maybe, but debatedly, on an internal budget trying to be competitive with a bunch of ELCs on the roster. On one hand trading Mitts didn't make sense because - why did you spend the time developing him just to trade him when he hit his prime? OTOH, maybe they traded him because they ARE on that internal budget, so they're chopping salary, saying Byram is a good player etc, to justify waiting on more ELC prospects to fill that C position.Seems like Buffalo has no direction or plan at any of the hockey operations levels.
The only logic that makes sense from a Buffalo POV is logic that I vehemently disagree with. If KA settles for Krebs as 3C and/or waiting on Savoie or maybe even Ostlund to become a capable C in 2-3 years, then that settles it to me. That will show the organization is happy with a perpetual "development" phase that may never change gears into a legit Cup contender. I'm fine waiting/hoping for Savoie or Ostlund, but not at the cost of wasting another couple years on hope while Krebs flounders in a role he isn't capable of, just to shallowly justify a portion of the Eichel trade.