Still working my way through the article but a couple thoughts.
Almost feels like she went into this to write an article about the Miller selection, or investigation into why Steve Sullivan was let go, had a bad interaction with BA because she was potentially looking into a touchy subject, and decided to go into the ownership group. I just don't know how an article that tries to cover 15 different topics was developed otherwise.
Staff having issues with a change of management style very much feels like someone working for a state entity, such as a university, changing jobs and working for a corporate entity, such as moving into an EdTech firm. All of a sudden your job will always be on the line. You have to think about how you present yourself in public while talking about your company. You are working for an entity that is actively trying to make a profit or it will fold, rather than one that is held up by the state (or in the Yotes case the NHL). It must have been a huge culture shift.