Packofwolves
Registered User
- Nov 5, 2017
- 720
- 1,295
There are a few others in there who might also rise a bit and stay ahead of him but I could see him being about 15-18. Several C's get a position boost.
Why don't you do a redraft.
There are a few others in there who might also rise a bit and stay ahead of him but I could see him being about 15-18. Several C's get a position boost.
Why don't you do a redraft.
I think Tolvanen might have been a slightly better pick.
Sucks to be us. I hate having a 20+ goal scoring, hard working, fast skating and hard fore-checking forward.
I think Tolvanen might have been a slightly better pick.
Looks like with guys like Tolvanen and Vesalainen doing well, the rivalry with Nashville will continue to grow. Balance of power may have finally switched to the Preds and Jets in the Central.
Preds will face some cap trouble in a couple of years when Josi is in the last year of his team friendly deal. They will still have PK at $9 mill, RJ at $8 mill, Turris at $6 mill and Forsberg at $6 mill. They will need cheaper players like Tolvanen and other draft picks, as we will.
Scheifele’s deal will be an advantage for us. Likely Ehlers too. Let’s hope Laine’s deal is what we deem team friendly as well.
May impact them, no doubt. Will need to see what Weber does.Don't forget the cap recapture penalty if and when Shae Weber retires
I think redrafts should be done like 3 years after the draft.
Don't forget the cap recapture penalty if and when Shae Weber retires
Can you enlighten me?Don't forget the cap recapture penalty if and when Shae Weber retires
Which Google translates to, the judge is a woody eye.
I'm not sure why some think this. There's a frenzy of rankings and mock drafts and then a real draft after prospects' 17-year old season, so what's wrong with re-ranking them after their 18-year old season, when you have a much better read on them than before their draft and on draft day?I think redrafts should be done like 3 years after the draft.
I think ranking these players after seeing what they're capable of doing in the NHL (If anything at all) is the proper way to do it. But that's just me, and i do understand why people love doing these rankings.I'm not sure why some think this. There's a frenzy of rankings and mock drafts and then a real draft after prospects' 17-year old season, so what's wrong with re-ranking them after their 18-year old season, when you have a much better read on them than before their draft and on draft day?
Victim of the worst crosscheck I've seen in a while. Knee injury wasn't far away.
I think it's fine to do a ranking after each year or so of competition, as their development tracks up by age and level of competition. Waiting until you see how they do in the NHL really doesn't have much interest in terms of projection. It's just more of an analysis of drafting performance based on hindsight, which isn't the same as projecting young players. In that case, it might be better to wait until 5 or 6 years after the draft. The two are different concepts (i.e. projecting prospects vs. assessing drafting acumen).I think ranking these players after seeing what they're capable of doing in the NHL (If anything at all) is the proper way to do it. But that's just me, and i do understand why people love doing these rankings.
I think Tolvanen might have been a slightly better pick.
I’m having EK9 flashbacks....
I think it was during the first Karpat vs HIFK game where the guy casting the game said that the biggest difference in Vesalainen's game now compared to early season is the amount of passes he makes to his team mates. It was something ridiculous like he passes the puck 5-6 times more now than he did at the beginning.If only EK could use his linemates.