At the time, it was quite widely agreed that Vesalainen was the BPA at 24. It was not like there were any surefire studs available after Heiskanen, let alone at the latter part of the first round.
Yes, I agree Jets had him ranked as their BPA at 24. I meant that I disagreed with the ida that they had Tolvanen ranked above Vesalainen when it came time to draft, but passed on him because they thought his potential was higher than Vesalainen’s, and that he wouldn’t have a spot with our elite top 6 in 2 years’ time. The poster above stated they preferred to draft Vesalainen because he could contribute in a 3rd line scoring role.