- Dec 12, 2017
- 26,005
- 12,452
It’s their right, but to be uncooperative when both parties agree they’re moving on would be a strange position to take.I don’t think refusing to waive makes someone unprofessional.
It’s their right, but to be uncooperative when both parties agree they’re moving on would be a strange position to take.I don’t think refusing to waive makes someone unprofessional.
Got it.I don’t believe a player is going to stomp their feet and have a hissy fit. But, if either side is unprofessional there’s not much you can do about.
Yes it would be if they both agree. Not sure how you can be agreeable and uncooperative at the same time.It’s their right, but to be uncooperative when both parties agree they’re moving on would be a strange position to take.
If a player refused a trade we be like………..how do you like your 6 minutes of 4th line duty. That should help your next contract a lot.
Time to take back the power
Not denying it could or has happened but what are some recent examples of players with full NMC on a contender waiving to leave?
I don’t think that is true at all.
Should be easy to provide examples then.They aren't moving Matthews because they contenders why would they do that?
All I'm saying is the notion that they can't If they wanted to is stupid it happens all the time
Who in this situation?I doubt the team has any intention of ever trading Matthews or Marner (like they likely don't with Nylander), but imo lots of folks in this thread are overestimating the impact that NMCs have on trade value. Plenty of guys with them end up getting traded if the situation arises