Video Nasty
Registered User
- Mar 12, 2017
- 5,673
- 9,892
For those arguing longevity… he’s already played 3 more games than Orr ever did.
He’s 5th right now. He has skills and does things we have never seen any other hockey player do.
If he wins one Cup in today’s era then he’s another guy that we can debate about when we rank the top 5 rather than the top 4.
That’s why Orr and Lemieux are vulnerable and it’s feasible that McDavid can be convincingly argued against anyone other than Gretzky. Howe is vulnerable as well because he had both peak and longevity, but quite frankly, as many Harts and Art Rosses as he did win, he should have won more being as great as he was in a smaller league.
I can see why they may continue to always be ranked over McDavid, but if he has a full career, his combined peak and longevity is going to sway a ton of people. If he fills out his trophy case and plays as many games combined as Orr and Lemieux did by the time they retired already being at or among the top of their field—657 for Orr and 745 when Mario retired in 1997–it’s ludicrous that he can’t be considered higher.