2 years of RFA Ryjo. Value was Jones.
Panarin has +20 points and 2 RFA years left. The value might be Laine/Marner/Pulju +1st.
Top10 league forward prospect for top10 league forward. 1st for insurance and large difficulty finding a trade target with assets, capspace and need for high end "right now" winger.
2 years of RFA Ryjo. Value was Jones.
Panarin has +20 points and 2 RFA years left. The value might be Laine/Marner/Pulju +1st.
Top10 league forward prospect for top10 league forward. 1st for insurance and large difficulty finding a trade target with assets, capspace and need for high end "right now" winger.
Mathews? are you serious?
You don't give up Mathews to get Panarin, if you get WITH Mathews
You could get Nylander or Marner or our 1st,all those things could be in a trade because to get Panarin you do need to deal prime assets I won't deny that.
But that prime asset is NOT Mathews
Just like earlier in the the the thread Monahan or Bennett you can package Bennett but you DO NOT touce Monahan because that defeats the purpose of getting Panarin which would be to play WITH Monahan
Same logic you can package Nylander or Marner or our 1st but you DO NOT touce Mathews because that defeats the purpose of getting Panarin which would be to play WITH Mathews.
Nobody will pay that, Maybe Marner but don't forget Panarin has 1 year only under his belt and he was playing with the best offensive player.
When did anybody say anything about Mathews?
2 years of RFA Ryjo. Value was Jones.
Panarin has +20 points and 2 RFA years left. The value might be Laine/Marner/Pulju +1st.
Top10 league forward prospect for top10 league forward. 1st for insurance and large difficulty finding a trade target with assets, capspace and need for high end "right now" winger.
I don't think Panarin is going anywhere.
Hossa will be playing in the desert, either Phoenix or Vegas next year. That clears several million of cap space for them to resign Panarin. If they have to, the deal is shorter to cover only the cheapest RFA years. Hossa & Panarin's cap hit combined is north of 6m. Chicago can work with that.
When GWH said to get him the price would be Mathews
While I like Panarin and think he will have a decent career , projecting him as a perrenial top 10 player after 1 strong season seems unwise...
If his value is really that high , then I don't see why Hawks don't keep him.
The post you quoted says Marner.
The salary cap exists.
When GWH said to get him the price would be Mathews
He has a lot of value and draft picks would likely not attract the Hawks because they're in win now mode.
Where? Link please?
If you seem to be unfamiliar with recapture penalties and how Hossas is one of the worst in the NHL, let me summarize it for you: Chicago wont trade Hossa
When GWH said to get him the price would be Mathews
Your insightfulness is remarkably astounding.
Let me familiarize you with similarly structured contracts, lets start with Pavel Datsyuk and Chris Pronger. You think Columbus or Toronto is worried about Nathan Horton's recapture penalty? How about Detroit worrying about Johan Franzen's?
Familiarize yourself with how teams are working within the rules of the CBA and working around the cap, including how they avoid the penalties in place.
Hossa does not have a messed up back like Horton or a history of concussions like Franzen.
He actually has both. But don't let little things like facts derail your argument.