I have no idea what Yeastomania is but I see Rongomania and Chytilmania both joined Dec 31 2017.Yeastomania. Epic season. We will live and die by his heat, again.
I have no idea what Yeastomania is but I see Rongomania and Chytilmania both joined Dec 31 2017.
I don't understand this narrative that Panarin was terrible last season. Was it his worst season as a Blueshirt? Sure, but it was still better than any season he had for either the Hawks or Columbus. He has exceeded expectations every season since his signing.Gladly eating crow about Panarin this year. What an amazing turnaround from last year. We saw a season very similar in pure dominance to Jagr in 05-06 and Messier in 91-92 and 95-96. Just pure magic from Day 1 and it never stopped.
You're not wrong.Panarin would have been right there for the scoring title if he and Laf didn’t spend the first 60% of the season beefing most of the chances they were setting each other up with.
View attachment 852723View attachment 852724View attachment 852725View attachment 852726
It's very much splitting hairs but Panarin should probably be a Hart finalist.
Take out McDavid. He doesn't need it and it wasn't his best year.
Kucherov will win it. He shouldn't. He puts up an obscene amount of points but he's the most empty calories out of the four.
MacKinnon absolutely should win it. My goodness. Legit cheat code.
Panarin put up 120 and massively underperformed his expected results. I'm going to repeat that: he had 120 points and massively underperformed his expected results.
He should finish 2nd.
It probably is. He should have had closer to 140 based on how he was tilting the ice. It's not a criticism, I think he was actually unlucky.I think that this was the single best year by a Rangers forward . . . maybe ever? I mean, that's like all-time-great-level numbers from Panarin, there.
Still the PO will be the judge. The jury's out.I think that this was the single best year by a Rangers forward . . . maybe ever? I mean, that's like all-time-great-level numbers from Panarin, there.
A big reason why I can't stand the people who use traditional counting stats to compare Laf to other players.It probably is. He should have had closer to 140 based on how he was tilting the ice. It's not a criticism, I think he was actually unlucky.
Lafreniere (also not shitting on him, just saying) hit Dubsinky levels of hitting the post this year.
Don't forget all the feeds to Trochek that he couldn't convert. Panarin could have easily had a 140 point season.Panarin would have been right there for the scoring title if he and Laf didn’t spend the first 60% of the season beefing most of the chances they were setting each other up with.
thanksphil esposito and wayne gretzky both have better 32 seasons