hi
Sell sell sell
- May 23, 2008
- 7,612
- 5,089
Worst hairlines in Rangers history:
1. Panarin
2. Stepan
3. Messier
1. Panarin
2. Stepan
3. Messier
Kucherov is bigger and definitely plays with a bit more of an edge. He seems to score more goals around the net and on redirections than Panarin who scores purely from the slot or on the rushQuestion to people smarter than me in hockey. Panarin seems like such a similar player to Kucherov but Kucherov is more productive (which is more of a compliment to Kucherov than a knock on Panarin). What does Kucherov have that Pamarin doesn't?
I think they are very similar stylistically, Kucherov is a faster skater and plays with guys who are more skilled and not as stupid when it comes to creating offenseQuestion to people smarter than me in hockey. Panarin seems like such a similar player to Kucherov but Kucherov is more productive (which is more of a compliment to Kucherov than a knock on Panarin). What does Kucherov have that Pamarin doesn't?
Better line mates and size.Question to people smarter than me in hockey. Panarin seems like such a similar player to Kucherov but Kucherov is more productive (which is more of a compliment to Kucherov than a knock on Panarin). What does Kucherov have that Panarin doesn't?
It is the lafreniere affect. He has had elite 5v5 #s for 3 years now. PP time is what’s keeping him from All Star status.Bread was flying again last night.
At some points in the game it looked like he was skiing on his skates out there.
Is it possible that you can actually improve your game at 32? He's amazing.
Agree Kucherov is faster but I think Panarin is a way better skater than people on here suggest, I think people see the NHL Edge thing where he doesn't rank well but that's only top speed, so I think that difference in eye test vs NHL edge is because his acceleration is good and so is his agility. I'd still say he's one of the better skaters on the teamBiggest difference between the 2 is speed, by far. Panarin doesn't have the ability to beat defenders with physicality which makes him more predictable when he does a pull up on zone entry like 80% of the time. Kucherov also has a superior one-timer but Bread probably has the more accurate snap shot. Probably the most accurate shooter in the league or at worst top 3. Both amazing passers and vision.
Prime Panarin was closer to what Kucherov currently is. I know Panarin statistically is having his best year, but watch some of his 5 on 5 play when he was with Chicago and Columbus. He's a smarter player now but he was a quicker player then, whether that was him just being faster at a younger age or the league being slower at that time. Or more likely a combination of the two
Now I'm going to have dreams of the Rangers recreating that trade with Laf and/or Kakko traded for X.I had a dream that Panarin was traded for Brandon Saad again.
lol. Got love this ridiculous false narrative. No one bullies the Rangers. We are literally 3rd in hits, and when Trouba and Lindgren are back in the lineup, they Rangers are probably the most physical team in the league.Eh, I don't think Panarin and Kucherov are really that comparable. They're both deceptive and have elite playmaking vision, but Kucherov is much, much more aggressive and physical in how he pushes offense. A big part of Tampa coming back to beat us was that they started bullying us, and Kucherov was one of the guys that lead the charge on that.
Panarin leans much more heavily on that deception and vision. That's why the gap between the two becomes a chasm in the playoffs.
Go back to his first two years as a Ranger. This is who he was. It's just a matter of him playing a more complete game. He's shooting the puck more. He's backchecking more. He's battling more. He's getting to the middle more and turning the puck over less.Bread was flying again last night.
At some points in the game it looked like he was skiing on his skates out there.
Is it possible that you can actually improve your game at 32? He's amazing.
lol. Got love this ridiculous false narrative. No one bullies the Rangers. We are literally 3rd in hits, and when Trouba and Lindgren are back in the lineup, they Rangers are probably the most physical team in the league.
thats probably because our even strength possession numbers were so bad, we are definitely a soft team but Rempe is changing that thankfullylol. Got love this ridiculous false narrative. No one bullies the Rangers. We are literally 3rd in hits, and when Trouba and Lindgren are back in the lineup, they Rangers are probably the most physical team in the league.
I’m sorry, I didn’t realize you were talking about the playoff series two years ago. I was talking about this year, and I thought you meant the last game when we had a 2-0 lead.We absolutely got bullied. If you think that Tampa just outskilled us when they came back and took the series, then that's the false narrative.
We're definitely more physical now (though most physical in the league may be a stretch), but we probably weren't even in the top half of the league then.