Around the NHL

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
He missed games last season due to a broken ankle. He missed games this season due to a torn meniscus. Neither of those injuries warrant long term concern in my opinion.

Michael Gallagher’s take on Zegras from yesterday when the news broke that Anaheim was taking calls.

IMG_0738.jpeg
 
I'd happily give up draft capital this year to get him. Again, guys that have that level of creativity and high upside are never available without reason. If they were perfect prospects, they wouldn't be available. There is too much smoke for him to not actually be available in my opinion, and maybe Anaheim is finally trying to move on from him so they can turn the page if they aren't getting along. I absolutely think he still has top C ability and would love to see him here with ROR for a couple years. These are the type of reclamation projects that can completely speed up the "rebuild". If he busts out, then we are still in a bad spot...same place we are now.
 
He's young, which I like. Has one more season until the $5.5 million AAV expires which I like. But missed 2/3 last season and has missed time this year...eh....as with most, depends on the ask. Maybe one of our low 1st and a mid-high prospect?
He's likely better than anyone available in the late 1st so depends on the prospect. Bigger issue is he's a Matt Duchene/Tommy Novak-type center but not a center and wants to be played in that spot. As a 2nd line winger if we managed to get another center, maybe better shot at success here.
 
I expect Zegras gets traded for a not crazy package and will go do really well somewhere and we'll add him to the list of guys we should have gone after. I also think if we were to trade for him he'd be a total bust and whatever late pick we put into the package ends up being the next Pastrnak or something.
 
Zegras

Pros
Young
Center(ish)
Has hit 60+ points early in his career

Cons
Probably a high acquisition cost
Injury issues and decreased production this and last season.
Pretty hefty contract if he doesnt rebound but only 1 season after this


If the cost isnt rediculous, which it shouldnt be given his performance and injuries, id be game to give it a shot.
 
I just look at Zegras as young and dumb, but oozing talent. He may never figure out the rest in order to maximize his talent, but he also could very well mature and turn into a high-end C. We don't have anyone with his upside currently in our prospect pool. It is certainly a gamble, but we aren't exactly throwing away our winning ways if we take that gamble. We have draft capital and plenty of NHL level prospects, but we don't have anyone that has even the potential of being a top 15-20 center in the league. Trotz should absolutely be exploring this possibility, but my guess is he's not the type of player Trotz would want to spend assets on, and he'd rather find "cereal winners". You know the cereal winner thing has worked out so far, so why move away from that idea?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston
I actually don't think Zegras' price would be all that high. He's struggled now for two years straight, is probably a long-shot to make it as a top-six center in the NHL (therefore being a smaller WINGER lowers his value quite a bit).

All that being said, that's exactly the type of player we should be going after. I don't think anyone of us want a long rebuild but rather a quick turnaround and those are the potential players that can help accomplish it.
 
I actually don't think Zegras' price would be all that high. He's struggled now for two years straight, is probably a long-shot to make it as a top-six center in the NHL (therefore being a smaller WINGER lowers his value quite a bit).

All that being said, that's exactly the type of player we should be going after. I don't think anyone of us want a long rebuild but rather a quick turnaround and those are the potential players that can help accomplish it.
I would certainly be more inclined to go after a Zegras if I saw any signs that our coaching staff or GM were willing to invest the time/opportunity in skilled younger players in ways that might see them maximize their potential. But since we see the Exact Opposite of that... it makes it a lot less interesting to want to pay the acquisition cost for that type of player. :dunno:
 
I actually don't think Zegras' price would be all that high. He's struggled now for two years straight, is probably a long-shot to make it as a top-six center in the NHL (therefore being a smaller WINGER lowers his value quite a bit).

All that being said, that's exactly the type of player we should be going after. I don't think anyone of us want a long rebuild but rather a quick turnaround and those are the potential players that can help accomplish it.
I actually don't see a clear package we would offer that the Ducks would be interested in or wouldn't ultimately be an overpay from our end. His past two years are largely injury-ridden, which the Ducks side will contend explains the dropped production (and I suspect everyone who wants him here thinks the same).

Does a non-Preds 1st + a Kemell/Wood + a Vange/ZLH get it done from a Ducks perspective and is also palatable to us? I don't think it does for them, as none of those pieces have the upside, even if he he may not re-reach it that Zegras has. Are we ok giving up that much for a guy that's spent 2 seasons at .5 PPG and seems to have issues with his coach/usage?

This is aside from the issues Porter points out and we're not exactly a prime spot for helping forwards reach their potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porter Stoutheart
I actually don't see a clear package we would offer that the Ducks would be interested in or wouldn't ultimately be an overpay from our end. His past two years are largely injury-ridden, which the Ducks side will contend explains the dropped production (and I suspect everyone who wants him here thinks the same).

Does a non-Preds 1st + a Kemell/Wood + a Vange/ZLH get it done from a Ducks perspective and is also palatable to us? I don't think it does for them, as none of those pieces have the upside, even if he he may not re-reach it that Zegras has. Are we ok giving up that much for a guy that's spent 2 seasons at .5 PPG and seems to have issues with his coach/usage?

This is aside from the issues Porter points out and we're not exactly a prime spot for helping forwards reach their potential.
I'll bet Zegras won't fetch nearly that much. Remember a 2022 top-five pick was traded just this season for a B prospect plus a couple of picks. Zegras is a 2019 pick and hasn't done anything in the last two seasons AND he doesn't play a premium position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston
I'll bet Zegras won't fetch nearly that much. Remember a 2022 top-five pick was traded just this season for a B prospect plus a couple of picks. Zegras is a 2019 pick and hasn't done anything in the last two seasons AND he doesn't play a premium position.
I think if he was going for a package that low he already would have been traded. There'd be enough GMs that would ignore the negatives for visions of 65+ points and Michigan goals.
 
I think if he was going for a package that low he already would have been traded. There'd be enough GMs that would ignore the negatives for visions of 65+ points and Michigan goals.
Perhaps. But I remember the initial proposals for Jiricek, too, and he ended up going for A LOT lower than those.
 
I'll bet Zegras won't fetch nearly that much. Remember a 2022 top-five pick was traded just this season for a B prospect plus a couple of picks. Zegras is a 2019 pick and hasn't done anything in the last two seasons AND he doesn't play a premium position.
I suppose ultimately they won't want to continue to pay a 0.5ppg-ish guy $5.75M... which will be his QO after next season as an RFA. But maybe they would wait a bit to see if he starts re-justifying that salary again a little more first? It's not like the Ducks are trying to compete or in any Cap trouble meanwhile. :dunno:

Unless his personality is just so much of a problem in the room. He's rumored to be sort of hot-headed and overly cocky, at some point maybe that just becomes too much of a distraction? (And I'm sure that reputation is also something which Trotz would find very endearing also. :sarcasm:)

Anyway, were it not for what seems like how bad the fit is to our organizational preferences, I'd give up like Wood and the Vegas 1st for him, perhaps. But of course it always just depends on what other organizations are bidding, etc. If pro scouts aren't really sold on a guy (like Jiricek) then it will certainly be reflected in how the market bids on him. At least with Zegras he does have the track record of scoring 60+ points at a very young age in the NHL. So there is some demonstrated evidence that if you let him play his game, he can produce. And that's 1st or 2nd in scoring on a team where he wasn't surrounded with much talent. That's a little different than a guy who people are questioning if he can even stick in the NHL at all. :dunno:
 
Taking gambles on a player like Zegras is fine as long as you don't pay too much. I suspect it's why he hasn't been moved before. Anaheim wants pieces like he is a top tier young player but GM's are looking at it as a 1st + mediocre prospect because they view him as a gamble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bringer of Jollity
Also, Joel Farabee was traded for pretty much nothing a week ago. Farabee's a year older than Zegras and put up 50 points just last year.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad