Toggle sidebar

Around the NHL XII: Conference Finals Edition!

  • Thread starter Thread starter *Bob Richards*
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Enough with the infraction talks openly on the forum. We've warned you guys already about this. Next step is for us to start handing out our own infractions.
 
darko said:
If by a fluke you mean completely outplayed then yes you'd be correct.
Click to expand...

I meant Montreal getting to the CF was a fluke, not the Rangers beating them.

It's in response to people who are criticizing two teams who have dominated the sport the last three or four seasons, and didn't understand that elite-vs-elite matchups doesn't mean perfect, mistake free hockey.

Fans are stupid. If it's a 0-0 game then both teams are boring with no skill. If it's a 5-4 game, both teams have overrated defenses and poor goalies.

The fact remains that the Rangers have yet to face a team like Chicago or LA in a seven game series and will have their work cut out for them, moreso than vs Philly or Pitt or Montreal.

And it's not because of skill or size or speed. It's because Chicago and LA are champions and have an understanding most of the Rangers don't have.

Neither team is invincible. They just both have an advantage.
 
GWOW said:
I meant Montreal getting to the CF was a fluke, not the Rangers beating them.

It's in response to people who are criticizing two teams who have dominated the sport the last three or four seasons, and didn't understand that elite-vs-elite matchups doesn't mean perfect, mistake free hockey.

Fans are stupid. If it's a 0-0 game then both teams are boring with no skill. If it's a 5-4 game, both teams have overrated defenses and poor goalies.

The fact remains that the Rangers have yet to face a team like Chicago or LA in a seven game series and will have their work cut out for them, moreso than vs Philly or Pitt or Montreal.

And it's not because of skill or size or speed. It's because Chicago and LA are champions and have an understanding most of the Rangers don't have.

Neither team is invincible. They just both have an advantage.
Click to expand...

Agree and let's face it, chances are that we wouldn't be here had the Habs not beaten the Bs. And on top of that, the Habs gave us game 1 since after beating the Bs they thought they had already won the cup.

Point is we will be the underdogs vs either LA or CHI and should be. It's not an insult. Just facts that our odds of winning the SCF will be the highest of the 4 series. But we can win.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom