I thought the Rangers looked pretty damn good last game, particularly in their own end. There will always be def zone breakdowns and blown coverages. The other team is, after all, putting all their effort into trying to cross you up, gain separation, and create and exploit openings. But the Rangers played the puck holders well and their coverage of players away from the puck was damn good. And to my eyes at least appeared to out-hit Boston and cause more turnovers.
I watched that game at 4 am and was kinda brain dead. But to me, it appeared the Rangers did not give away a whole lot and I thought played a very good game.
I'm sure Chicago is fun to watch on some level. They don't have shit to play for, so they won't have to D up all too much and can go guns blazing on offense. Player stats usually look about the same for most cellar teams: guys with inflated point totals and +/- ratings ranging from even to shit show.
I'd rather look "boring" and responsible than "exciting" and losing.